Dachte mir schon, dass das nicht so einfach geht. Gelten für S-Bahnen die gleichen Regeln? Die Bahn ist nämlich höchstens eine Minute gestanden bevor sie zurück gesetzt hat, ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass in der Zeit eine schriftlicher Befehl angefordert wurde, andererseits war ich natürlich froh nicht noch 10min direkt am Ziel festzustecken.
Tacoma
Was, wenn der Zug (S-Bahn in diesem Fall) hinter dem Bahnsteig hält und dann entweder ne Durchsage bringt "Bitte nicht aus der ersten Tür aussteigen" oder den Rückwartsgang einlegt um wieder an den Bahnsteig zu kommen?...
Aber dann 12 Stunden vor der Spende keinen Alkohol trinken... D.h. ich muss jetzt 13h vorher auf ca. 1.8 Promille kommen damit ich nach 13h mit 0.5 noch nicht nüchtern bin?!
I agree that there is a big grey area on what is too sick to work, but with my proposal at least we are a big step further and instead of the employer deciding for you (who wants you to work for them) or you deciding on your own (who might not want to come to work after a night partying), there is now an (hopefully) independant entity, the doctor who decides.
But I have to admit that of course the doctor can only listen to the patient and decide based on that, because there is just no way to measure pain/sickness objectively. So in the end we have to trust people to decide on their own if they are sick.
With your proposed solution of x sick days, I guess that many people that are actually too sick for work have to work just because they don't have enough days, while some that don't get sick might use their sick days anyway, because they have them. And even with my solution, realistically there will be a lot of people going to work when they should rest, while there will also be people that use the system to rest after celebrating. I don't think a perfectly fair system is possible, but I prefer the system where people are not exploited and supressed.
Coming back to your argument on periods, like I said, there is no way to measure someones pain besides asking them, and ignoring their answer is not the solution, so yes women should be able to take leaves for period pain. And yes, men should be able to take leaves if they feel like crap, even if that might mean taking of a day off that they might have been able to work. In the end the grey area is not perfectly convertable to able to work/not able to work.
But that's not what they are expecting. They expect to not have to work if they are sick. And that should apply to anyone, shouldn't it? Which leaves the question, who has to care for the sick? Historically that would be the family, but nowerdays with the focus on individualism, either everyone has to care (e.g. by some health care system) or we just accept that sick people are not cared for in our society and hope that we don't get sick. I know I prefer the first solution
And that's why the amount of paid leave should not be limited by time but by reason. If you can't work because you're pregnant or sick or whatever, you get paid leave until you are better. And the employer or coworkers don't even need to know why you can't work, that's for a doctor to decide. And anyone saying it's not fair if they have to work more because they are not sick as often is obviously just selfish and not interested in equality
Das erinnert mich an Arschkalt!
Why is the flashlight crossed out? Why do active buttons seem to have a different border radius? And what's that circle icon that looks like a crosshair, location service? Whats wrong with the old icon? So many questionable design decisions and inconsistencies...
Afaik, organic is related to how things are grown and processed. For example, you shouldn't use the peel from normal lemons as they are treated with fungicide wax that is not exactly healthy. If you buy organic lemons, you can use the peel. But I agree that the term is overused and missunderstood a lot, and blindly trusting that organic foods are healthy does not work
Danke für die Spendenliste, das sind ein paar gute Vorschläge von der CDU!
Where are the [citation needed] stickers, though?