Did you mean... You wood transition?
I don't really understand what is the end goal here. It isn't minimising the amount of total work done, because for this optimal strategy would be just leaving the seat in whatever position it was used. Funnily enough, amount of times it needs to be put up is exactly the same it needs to be put down in absolute terms, but considering the "up" group is smaller than "down group", their perceived amount of times position should be changed is higher than the same for the opposite group. I. e. in group of one "up" and 9 "downs", "ups" need to change position of lid with 90% probability, and for every "down" it's only 10%. Huh. Of course overall it equalizes: 1×0.9=9×0.1.
Or is it some kind of "welcomeness"? Like, leaving the lid in the most probable expected position (which for equal gender usage would be "sitting" because people sometimes poop, usually not while standing; and because penis people sometimes pee while sitting (me often, but usually at home, not in public)).
Or is it something else?
I guess then I just didn't understand yours :)
It's kinda programmer-ish joke about interpreting
While true
As a function, and text after coma as its body block to output. Sorry, I thpught it's funny
Output:
He did transition
He did transition
He did transition
He did transition
He did transition
...
Slave owners when master owner appears
KWGT widget is very WIP though)
Yes, I kinda understand what is what. Just seemingly can't force myself to actually imagine it. It's funny.
To be fair, I can't even see it in the first place
Five hundred cigarettes
Nuh-uh
Is this still the same angel every time? Though I guess they won't mind.