That seems incredibly unlikely.
Once again, I long for precidented times.
SaltSong
joined 4 months ago
I didn't say otherwise.
I have no comment on weather the Korean War was a genocide. I don't know enough about the topic.
Your statement, that I replied to, was "Nothing in the community rule say that the content should be about established facts"
That is what I understand. But that is not meaningful in this case. Speaking purely hypothetically, there is no reason that the US could not take advantage of North Korean aggression as an excuse to commit the genocide that the article accuses them of.
Should we be learning things that aren't true?
The cultural relationship with time is more important than its absolute measurement.
This was the statement at the top of this discussion. It values the local concept of what time should be over an objective measurement of what time is.
The proposed change wouldn't cause much of a problem. But the idea under the statement I quoted would.
that is such a small edge case that it’s not necessary to talk about them
Did you manage to overlook this point?
In general, stay out of the ducking way.
And in both cases, missing the point. Categorize based on the chemistry, not the source of the chemical.
That's an untenable position. I mean, Cocaine is a plant, too.
I mean we as a group. Some of us will, but they will be decried by the rest of us. Too much, too far, too soon.
If we could all get on the same page, that would be one thing. But it's like unions, isn't it? Once man stopping work is just quitting. The whole factory stopping work is industrial action.
Your reading comprehension needs work.