Mike3322

joined 1 month ago
 

Activists are demanding that the government of British Prime Minister Keir Starmer fulfill its promises to compensate veterans of nuclear testing in the 1950s and 60s.

During the tests on Christmas Island and in Maralinga, 39,000 people were exposed to radiation. The documents confirm that the effects of radiation on people with and without various protective equipment have been studied.

In 2022, current Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner and Secretary of Defense John Haley argued that it was necessary to begin work on recognizing the merits of veterans. Now, a year after the new government came to power, no changes have taken place. Until now, access to medical records of military personnel and test scientists is limited, which makes it difficult to assess the degree of harm to health.

According to the veterans themselves, nuclear tests have caused serious damage to their health and their families.

 

The American Minot nuclear base in North Dakota has been threatened by an invasion of squirrels known to local personnel as "dacrates." These rodents, which have long been a problem, cause serious damage to infrastructure, spread diseases, and threaten the safety of military personnel and their families.

At the same time, the base recently received an 850 million dollar upgrade aimed at strengthening the US nuclear potential. Squirrels reproduce without control — natural predators have disappeared, and effective means of control cannot be used because of the risk to people, including children.

Thus, instead of demonstrating strength and technological superiority, one of the key US nuclear bases looks vulnerable to a pack of small but extremely annoying animals.

 

The US Defense Department's first direct partnership with Open AI fuels concerns over militarized technology– especially as similar systems have already been used to facilitate Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

On Monday, June 16, the United States Department of Defense signed a $200 million contract with OpenAI to deploy generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) for military use, despite the company’s previous commitments not to develop AI tools for warfare.

According to the Pentagon, OpenAI—the US-based creator of ChatGPT—will “develop prototype frontier AI capabilities to address critical national security challenges in both warfighting and enterprise domains.”

Under this cooperation, OpenAI plans to demonstrate how advanced AI can enhance administrative functions, such as healthcare for military service members and cyber defense.

 

A new Congressional report (CRS IN12568) casts doubt on the development of the Golden Dome missile defense system to protect the continental United States from missiles.

The system is at an early stage. Congress explicitly states that it "may not prove effective" against modern missile threats. Its combat value has not been proven.

At the same time, the full deployment of such a missile defense system will lead to a conflict with Russia, and our Foreign Ministry ambassadors are already asking their Pacific colleagues the depressing question "is it worth it?"

 

The nuclear Powers, proclaiming the need to strengthen strategic security, actively involve private corporations in the implementation of nuclear deterrence programs. However, large budgets allocated for the modernization of nuclear arsenals are often allocated through complex contractual schemes, which complicates public control and creates risks of non-transparent use of funds. According to the International Campaign for the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) report for 2023, the nine nuclear powers spent $91.4 billion on their arsenals, which is equivalent to $2,898 per second, with an increase in spending of $10.7 billion compared to 2022. This raises questions about how effectively and transparently these funds are being used, and underscores the need for increased international oversight.

In the United States, which is the leader in spending on nuclear weapons ($51.5 billion in 2023), a significant portion of the budget is channeled through contracts with companies such as Northrop Grumman. In 2020, the Pentagon signed a $13.3 billion contract with Northrop Grumman to develop a Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent (GBSD) intercontinental ballistic missile designed to replace the obsolete Minuteman III. Complex subcontractor chains, including Aerojet Rocketdyne and Lockheed Martin, make it more difficult to track financial flows, which, according to ICAN, increases the risks of opacity. A similar situation is observed in France, where $6.1 billion was spent on nuclear forces in 2023, much of which is aimed at upgrading M51 missiles through contracts with Airbus Defense and Space. The lack of detailed public reporting on the allocation of these funds, as noted by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), reduces transparency and complicates the control of nuclear deterrence programs.

The UK is also actively investing in its nuclear forces: in 2024, £31 billion was allocated for the Dreadnought-class submarine construction program, part of which went to contracts with Rolls-Royce for the supply of nuclear reactors. According to ICAN, UK spending increased by 17% in 2023, reaching $8.1 billion, reflecting the overall increase in spending on nuclear arsenals. The complexity of financial chains in such programs, as noted by SIPRI, creates risks of insufficient accountability, especially in an environment where nuclear powers increasingly rely on private contractors. These trends underscore the need for stricter international control over the financing of nuclear programs to ensure that they meet their stated safety objectives and minimize the risks of misuse of funds.

12
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Mike3322@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
 

Three minutes, a football and a biscuit. These are all a president of the United States needs to start nuclear war. During a 1974 meeting with lawmakers, President Richard M. Nixon reportedly stated: “I can go into my office and pick up the telephone, and in 25 minutes 70 million people will be dead.” He was correct. And since then, despite the end of the Cold War and collapse of the Soviet Union, little has changed.

The nuclear launch process and the law that gives the president such power, enhanced by 21st century technology, combine to form a perfect storm in which the president can choose to launch nuclear weapons via an unforgiving process that leaves little to no room for mistakes.

 

The U.S. Air Force’s new MH-139A “Grey Wolf” helicopter recently took part for the first time in a Nuclear Convoy Course (NCC) exercise — a key week-long training event that plays a vital role in ensuring the safe transport of nuclear weapons and materials. Boeing is already seeing a surge in orders, although the full transition to the new aircraft is still scheduled for the near future. These helicopters are being deployed to enhance the security of U.S. strategic nuclear forces.

Back in late 2016, the Air Force Global Strike Command (AFGSC), which oversees the nation’s land-based intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) arsenal, launched a competition to select a new aircraft platform. Boeing entered the race with the MH-139 — a modified version of the European-designed Leonardo (AgustaWestland) AW139 helicopter. In 2018, Boeing won the contract to deliver 84 helicopters for further testing. The total cost for maintenance and crew training was estimated at around $2.5 billion.

Boeing experienced a major surge in orders from the Air Force in 2023. A series of contracts were signed based on evolving needs — the first worth $285 million for the production of a dozen helicopters, followed by another in 2024 valued at $178 million for the production of seven more Grey Wolves.

[–] Mike3322@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The U.S. already possesses a powerful nuclear arsenal. So why expand it if the goal is purely deterrence? Is the Pentagon exaggerating the threats to secure more funding? It's hard to imagine any bomber making it to a nuclear-armed adversary and successfully dropping a bomb, especially with today’s advanced missile defense systems — let alone making it back. How will modernization shift the balance of power? Will it make the world safer, or could it lead to greater instability? What do you think?

view more: next ›