This reminds me of that "study" on social networks that used AIs
Kirk
joined 7 months ago
I think the concern is the tracking of offline social networks
That appears to be you avoiding explaining how a CEO of a for-profit company could censor an entire "decentralized" "open source" app for millions of people.
But that was already in the process of changing
But I thought BlueSky was open source and decentralized? /s
EDIT: In case it's not obvious (as it apparently isn't to OP) if BlueSky was either of those things then it could not be simply shut down by a CEO.
Well this is a take I can't believe is being upvoted....
To answer your question, no every movie has been good. I'm sure if they made a Section 31 movie it would be good too but they never actually made it so we'll never know.
Funny the Star trek cookbook I use has not produced many tasty dishes...
Reddit won't ban the shitheads but they will summarize their post history so you can better determine who the shitheads are! ....thanks?
the note says "please dont be that guy on the internet"
There are dozens of us!
Is this thing as sketchy as it seems?
Sam Altman and Andreessen Horowitz involvement should be all you need to know. But the reality is probably less dystopian than some people make it out to be. World to me just seems to be Altman trying to sell a solution to the problem that he's trying to create with OpenAI (chatbots that are indistinguishable from humans).
More evasion. "Client" is Bluesky's techno jargon for "app". You still need a BlueSky account to use a client. And you can't get one of those in Mississippi.
Maybe it would help your argument that the thing BlueSky themselves says is happening is not really happening if you could produce a BlueSky post ~~that is available in~~ posted from Mississippi?