Izzy

joined 1 year ago
[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I believe you can send DMs over the Matrix protocol. I've never looked into it.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Matrix has some Lemmy integration already and perhaps more in the future.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Those two things don't seem conflicting. Some bad actor right now could upload illegal content to lemmy.world. It's not like lemmy.world can defederate with itself as a solution. It must deal with it by deleting the content. An instance could potentially delete illegal content coming from everywhere on the lemmyverse. This would take a lot of work so if you didn't want to bother doing that for instances other than your own you would defederate.

If some instance owner for whatever reason decided to take on this work either manually or with some automated process that allowed an instance to exist that is federated with everything, but clear of illegal content then it would be an appealing instance. Assuming I could curate my own instance block list.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure. This isn't a solution to the problem lemmy.world is having. I just think this feature should exist.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It won't protect a server from getting illegal content on their drives. Best to defederate if that is happening and can't be dealt with otherwise. If you have some other method of dealing with illegal content on your server and wanted to host a Lemmy instance that is federated with everything it would only be appealing to me if I could block instances myself.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

If we could control instance level blocking on a user level it would be much more feasible.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

What kind of moderation tools could help with this?

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone seems to be micro blogging there own stuff. There are probably people reading various things, but nobody cares enough to respond. I think Twitter fed on drama which got people upset enough to respond. I think Mastodon is still sorting itself out. People will catch on eventually to how it all works.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It can be an argument if you want, but it seems more like a discussion to me. I refute the idea that gifs are horrible and obsolete. You even give a use case in your post. If I have a 1 second looping image I'd much rather use a gif than a video format. So I believe they should work on Lemmy. The rest of the internet has no problem supporting this format.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Gifs are extremely efficient though. There is only downloading and no decoding necessary to play it back so it has no impact on your CPU. If you have a screen full of 1000 GIFs then your CPU won't start melting. Try playing 1000 video files on your computer no matter how small they are.

However, there is no reason for a 50mb GIF to exist. If you actually have something that is longer than a few seconds you should not use GIF.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It's a toss up. There are a lot of people on Mastodon and I wouldn't want to somehow get drama on my personal blog that is not really meant to be seen by the wider world. It's harmless content to be sure, but the internet is a weird place. I would potentially want to keep it isolated and just use Mastodon when I want to.

[–] Izzy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Fascinating. I actually just started a self hosted wordpress and might try this. Maybe.. Getting mastodon people in the comments might not be a positive thing. 🤔

 

Is there some way to hide deleted posts? When someone spams a bunch of posts and then they get deleted the post is still there taking up space. It would be nice if there was a setting to hide such posts or have them minimized in some way until you expand them.

view more: next ›