HybridSarcasm

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

For those that didn’t read the article, he was asked about his previous statements that he wanted to run for a third term. His response was meant to convey he was “trolling the fake news media.”

"I'll be an eight-year president, I'll be a two-term president. I always thought that was very important," Trump told NBC's Meet the Press with Kristen Welker in an interview that aired on Sunday.

Whether you believe those to be his intentions or not, it seems kind of important to understand he was responding to a question about earlier statements.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Ok, but you came seeking us. Please do us the kindness of answering the question while also pointing us towards the FAQs.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I know it’s easy internet likes to make a snarky political meme. But, can we not involve Star Trek? Why do we have to pollute this space with toxic politics? It’s everywhere else. Why does it have to be here?

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So, use something else, like Seafile.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, unless you feel like writing that feature into this project, perhaps you could modify your requirements slightly. Copying your local file to a share that’s also mounted to this handbrake-web instance would accomplish the same goal - taking local files and having them processed by this backend service.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Interesting. Is it fair to say you’ve created a web interface to standard image manipulation tools ?

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Your huge reason is the padlock in the browser bar? I’m not against TLS internally. I do it myself with my own CA. For this particular instance and the unique requirements, it seemed easiest to avoid TLS.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

I applaud your accomplishment as a penetration tester. I am disappointed at your lack of understanding regarding non-public networking.

Move your VPN to your router. Don’t bother with HTTPS on anything not exposed to the Internet.

If that does not satisfy your concerns, you may want to give up using electronic devices.

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Doesn’t seem to be possible to self-host

[–] HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Curious how this compares to Watchtower.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1147109

As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.

EDIT

After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:

"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."

This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".

 

As is stated in the title, I created and moderated !prolife@lemmy.world. According to the modlog, this community was removed 10 days ago. The modlog doesn't show me who removed the community. I understand the community wouldn't necessarily be everyone's cup of tea, but the actions taken seem improper.

EDIT

After making my case via email to info@lemmy.world, I received the following response:

"We would rather not have a prolife community on our instance. We were getting a lot of reports about it and we have enough on our plate. I'm sure you can find an instance that better suits your needs."

This community was incredibly small (19 subscribers), had less than 10 postings, and had several waves of trollings. Yet, the admins of lemmy.world would rather do away with this community than bother to review if it has broken any rules or is the target of trolling/bullying. I take nothing away from the right to run their instance as they see fit. Perhaps the Code of Conduct should also explicitly state "we reserve the right to do anything we want, regardless of any published rules".

view more: next ›