Guilherme

joined 1 month ago
[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

No, of course not. I was talking about a student using an AI that fails at realizing there's nothing academically relevant that relates to his name, so instead of acknowledging the failure or omitting such detail in its answer, it stubbornly uses whichever relates to that name even if out-of-context.

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

I bet a there's a group in the LGBT+ community that would like to watch adult movies filmed with such AI cameras.

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Programmer detected

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think of AI regurgitating content from the Facebook page of a normie - like it was an essay.

Evaluation of Weekend Minecraft-Driven Beer Eating and Hamburgher Drinking under the Limitations of Simpsology - Pages 3.1416 to 999011010

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Pretty... underrated.

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wow... Just wow...

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Post it again but with a parrot on his shoulder.

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

If the spaghetti doesn't work he has the boiling water to throw before fleeing.

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

So they were created about the same time as dinosaurs and flowers? Evolution was feeling really creative at that part of Cretaceous.

[–] Guilherme@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

That would be really cool. Problem is, conversation can get really wild because bots have a tendency to engage in folie-a-deux when interacting with each other. YouTube has videos posted by people who just put two chatbots talking to each other - with kafkian results. Maybe they could, given recent improvements of AIs, program them make one-time replies to each other, say, 10% of times?