Why would they when the website specifically and quite clearly distinguishes the two...only a person that makes no effort to understand what they're talking about would get confused and continue to spread false information.
Grippler
joined 1 year ago
They distinctly labeled them with names that are not even remotely close in wording, one even with a very clear and precise name of the intended feature set (FSD). I can't really see how people can think they're the same TBH, especially considering the clear distinction between the two on their website.
I 100% agree the feature set of FSD is false marketing and wildy misleading as it's currently not even close to delivering anything beyond level 2 autonomy, and hasn't for the past decade since they announced it was "ready end of year", albeit still more capable than the auto pilot feature (at least in the closed beta).
No it has always been an additional purchase. The only "self driving" mode that's included by default is their "auto pilot", which is just TACC with better lane assist so it can take sharper bends in the road without "bouncing" between the lines like most other cars do with lane assist.
Most people seem to incorrectly think that autopilot and FSD are the same thing, but they are not.
No it has always been an additional purchase. The only "self driving" mode that's included by default is their "auto pilot", which is just TACC with better lane assist so it can take sharper bends in the road without "bouncing" between the lines like most other cars do with lane assist.
Most people seem to incorrectly think that autopilot and FSD are the same thing, but they are not.
Sending a rocket on a ridiculously stupid task with no useful purpose is not even remotely close to having the same negative impact as this has the potential to. It's so far apart that it is honestly quite stupid to even attempt to compare them.
Considering it wouldn't need to run for-profit, it would cost much less than their market evaluation.
I'm not the guy suggesting nationalising SoMe, and I actually don't think it's a good thing to nationalise that particular function. But shutting down for-profit driven SoMe would probably be a good idea.
Huh, maybe it's just One+ then IDK. But honestly I couldn't care less, my phone always charges overnight, so I have no need for anything more than 5W anyway.
Doesn't most phones go that high these days? The One+ phones has their "warp charge" which maxes out at 65W
How high do you want your taxes to be, for a start?
High enough to cover proper healthcare and education (including higher education) for everyone. Personal wealth should never be a factor when it comes to education and healthcare.
It was used as a cheap replacement/filler in coffee during the German occupation in WW2 where i live. I think it's quite gross and tastes bad. Saying that the coffee must be from an old WW2 stock is often used as a reference/joke here when you have really bad tasting coffee.
Both are useless as payment in the real world at any meaningful scale ATM.
I mean, that's not really unique to Tesla customers in any way. Lots of people like to be early adopters of new things, tech more than other things I believe. More often than it's not very good when they buy in to it.