Ashenlux

Yes, that is also something you can practice and get better at. Every aspect of Art is something you need to practice at to get better at. im not arguing that skill with an art tool is important to being an artist. I'm only arguing that AI isn't a tool, it's a shortcut that tarnishes artistic integrity at best. And at worst, it takes the place of an artist and the user becomes nothing more then the commissioner. (Hence why you can't copy write AI "art", it legally not something you made.)

I'm sorry, how is a favorable view on AI "art" not the "STEM view" of things? It literally lacks all connection between life and art. It's just a fucking algorithm. I'm the one saying a connection between life and art is important for it to be art.

Now you are just arguing in circles. All it takes is practice. And if they truly don't want to do the work themselves, working with an artist can be a very rewording experience. Will hiring an artist cost money? Yes, but then you get to directly support the people making your idea come to fruition. Instead of using AI that steals those artists work to train it's algorithm and does nothing to support artist.

Ok, creativity is also something you can practice and get better at. I funny that in the first part, you mention creating art with "emotional and intellectual meaning" and then still support AI "Art" that lacks much of that.

Stop with the excuses. art is a skill that requires practice. if you don't put In the practice you won't be very good, but that doesn't mean you can't get good and gain that artistic ability. And go into any art community and ask about doing art with a disability. Half the artist probably have a disability. (If one has a disability the that makes it hard for them to hold a more conventional job, art can actually be a great source of income.) It may be more challenging, but with enough determination and practice, anyone can get good at art.

It's not like I'm very good at art either, the best I can do is sketch simple things I can see.

No AI will ever turn an idea into a picture better then taking pencil/paintbrush/pen in hand doing it yourself. The best you can get is "yeah that's close enough to what I was Invisioning" the computer doesn't know what you are thinking, and a description, no matter how in depth, can ever take what you have in mind and perfectly create it. AI is doing it's interpretation of what you ask for. And plus, the AI isn't an art tool, if anything, it's the artist. The prompt whiter is just the one commissioning it.

I have come to the same conclusion. The realization comes with lots of fear and anxiety, but also a bit of peace. The earth has gone through many mass extinction events and recovered, so hopefully it will do the same after this. It is interesting that this extinction event is caused in part by a species living on it that can see what is going on, had opportunities to prevent/mitigate it, and chose not to.

One of those things is not like the others. AI "art" is just feeding an AI a prompt until it spits out something you like. Some people may do a touch up to hide the hallucinations, but they aren't actually creating the image.

... No, they didn't.

I think him being the shareholder is the problem. I don't care if we was to step down as CEO, I want to see him hurt financially. Especially since he bought twitter off his Tesla stocks. Hit his stock hard enough and when it comes time to pay for twitter, he'll be fucked.

You didn't watch the video did you? He address that after the first test and said all further test will be done with self driving on.

Days might actually be better. If they go to work and come back to it rusted all over, they will know it was a malicious action. If they start to see rust the next day and see it slowly progress, it might be hard to trace back to someone.