He said he is asking Israel to honor the 1974 disengagement agreement establishing a demilitarized buffer zone after the 1973 October (Yom Kippur) War and to withdraw its troops to positions it held before 8 December.
His excellency, President ISIS doesn't realise that the Zionist entity doesn't negotiate if it can just take what it wants. Not one of his allies/masters would side with him over the entity for a grain of Syrian land.
I think the reason it's overused is because we are a minority and our opinions and positions go against the dominant ideology, so we feel a need to take a preemptively defensive position. It's like there is a fear of being ridiculed or called a shill or something.
I can't speak for hexbear because I don't even see an overuse here, but in the left corners of Reddit they abuse the hell out of the phrase, seemingly because they just don't know what it means. I've lost count how many times I've had to explain in the deprogram sub that critical support doesn't mean having policy disagreements.
Fair play but you know no profession could exist under capitalism telling people that their bosses and landlords dangling their well-being on front of them could use some help not being removed. Bourgeois culture already maligns therapists by incident, it'd bury them if 5% of therapists started suggesting fighting for strategic change.
After the last Usian election, I've come to believe that democrats are very much living in an alternate universe, especially if they spend enough time in DC. Between the blood on their hands, the consultants, charities etc where they are and their own astroturfing, they couldn't live in reality if they wanted to.
“We are doing our best to get Democrats to talk like normal people and stop talking like they’re leading a seminar at Antioch,” says Matt Bennett, Third Way’s executive vice president of public affairs.
The reason they don't sound like normal human beings isn't that they're using precise and academic languages to describe the condition of minorities, you dimwitted animal. They aren't proper human beings, so they can't talk properly.
As I write that, I know this removed knows this is hermeneutical injustice. They don't want marginalised groups to have the terms to describe their oppression. The sad part is how many of those marginalised actually bought into their relatively short-lived theatre of giving a shit.
President ISIS wants the old capital back, huh. If this is all accurate, the SDF might find out very soon that as dangerous as it is to be a Usian enemy, it's fatal to be a friend.
That's all true, so much so that even devs work clearly socialist inclinations can't go all the way and say outright that that's right and liberalism's wrong. Best they can do is mock the reactionaries in a way that lets us know their intentions while the liberals blissfully believe they're in on the joke.
Regarding the USSR, I think it runs way deeper than that. I'm not convinced there are enough devs in the west that are sufficiently well read that we could put them together in one studio to make one AA title that's historically and sociologically accurate on the USSR. Even if there were, and they solved the funding issue, what's their audience? Anglosphere liberals? This hits an extremely deep issue that won't be resolved for quite some time.
I didn't think about it until reading your comment, admittedly, but I don't think it's an inconsistent label exactly. I would appreciate correction from anyone better studied.
Kamikaze specifically and suicide in general in military "terms" don't seem to be used for simply an action ending the the termination of the actor, they seemingly refer to operation-capable actors engaging in an operation or action that will terminate them (i.e. death when referring to a person) when conceivably, there are alternatives, including surrender and other actions that would render the person, vehicle, or thing unusable for the conflict. A missile can't be spent and still be capable, same as any other ammunition. The drones, even if for these drones their only function in this conflict is to be a guided/flown bomb, could serve some other purpose.
That said these thoughts are entirely descriptive and it's entirely possible that so-called suicide drones be counted among ammunition in the near future. If that happens, it's also quite possible that we cease referring to their operation as a suicide.
Consider a benevolent warlord~
That sounds like setting yourself up for disappointment with extra steps.
The ~~Capitalists~~ slop machines will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.
Edit: Slop machine's rope suggestion didn't work, but blocking element with ublock did
Absolutely not. That'd require Anglosphere audiences to think critically and push back on "dated trans person" to "killed a fascist" pipeline, which, if only. From what little I've seen, it looks like the attempt at using transmisia to fuel fascist panic has succeeded.
That being said, all the chasers hurling themselves to put the lights out on select fascists would be beyond enjoyable.