this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
118 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

1410 readers
564 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

TikTok is a social media app that tracks an incredible amount of data. A change of location will not change this.

all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 36 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Everyone saying “it doesn’t matter that TikTok is based in China” is actually just saying that they don’t have any real understanding of how the CCP runs shit in China. It matters very fucking much that the government under which TikTok was created was the CCP.

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The vast majority of people using TiKTok have no idea what the CCP even is.

And hey, maybe they could be educated about that!

But that education isn't going to happen on TikTok under the control of the CCP.

[–] MentallyExhausted@reddthat.com 1 points 8 months ago

I’d wager that most people are familiar with Communist China.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile we accept everything else manufactured in China.

Except, of course, affordable vehicles.

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 10 points 8 months ago

I would avoid Chinese phones, network gear, and other computer hardware as well.

[–] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 22 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Every bad thing about Tiktok is also true about Twitter, Facebook or Instagram.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

You're right. I hope you're not saying that in order to defend TikTok but rather to support banning Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram too.

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

I have to disagree, not every bad thing ...

[–] ReallyKinda@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

You probably couldn’t reasonably sue a chinese company for mis-use

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

True but it's an order of magnitude worse on Tiktok. All of it.

[–] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

why worse? It's just exchanging American spies with Chinese spies.. Both are bad, but Americans are worse

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I wasn't talking about the spying. Even if no one was spying, Tiktok is still societal cancer.

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Lawmaker Who Led TikTok Ban Bill Joins Private Surveillance Firm

Mike Gallagher pushed the bill to ban TikTok because China can "surveil its users." Now, he's resigning and joining an American surveillance firm Palantir.

[–] TwinTusks@bitforged.space 1 points 8 months ago

Palantir

great name!

[–] rivr@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

why i have a feeling that they pick this "hot topic" only to promote themselves in a really lazy way

[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Tuta have been pretty slimy for a few years at this point. I would have moved off of it if they didn't honor my original subscription price; they've changed it a few times now and all the new prices are worse.

[–] rivr@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

they're still slightly better than proton which recently started to promote their premium down the throats. my partner noticed that tuta's sub changed slightly since the time he paid fo it - he wouldn't notice otherwise because i had to get it

[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

I agree, I moved from Proton to Tuta 😄

I just don't want to be reminded about my email, it should simply work.

Might end up so bothered by this problem that I just host it myself.

[–] miss_brainfarts@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Both of them can get real annoying at times.

Oh, so have you heard the news about Skiff shutting down? Well here's our list of alternative providers, reading which will just waste your time because obviously we're going to crown ourselves as the best!

So unnecessarily pretentious

[–] rivr@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

bleh don't remind me about skiff. i made a spare account for least important stuff there only to witness this "sunsetting"; i hope theyll all get fired as fast and joyful as they sold themselves to notion

[–] ninjabard@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So, the only solution is to not use it? Got it.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

No. The only solution is to ban it to stop the idiots from using it, too. The problem cannot be solved individually, only collectively.

[–] cloudless@feddit.uk 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It definitely matters. It is being use as a propaganda tool.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] 0x815@feddit.de 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@huginn

One example:

TikTok Facilitates CCP’s Arrest of Uyghurs in China

The Uyghur Times has documented at least 20 individuals who vanished after sharing videos criticizing the Chinese government on TikTok between 2021 and 2023.The International Version of TikTok has a long history of suspending or suppressing users who share content criticizing the Chinese government. That is why you don’t see Uyghur activists on this platform; that is why so many people don’t know what is happening to the Uyghur people.You may not care, but we Uyghurs are clear about one fact: TikTok is the genocidal arm of the Chinese government.

You'll find a large number of examples on how the CCP censors their web.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Ty for context

I thought tiktok wasn't available in China?

Do they mean douyin or was it them using tiktok?

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Citing tbe article that "the International Version of TikTok has a long history of suspending or suppressing users who share content criticizing the Chinese government," it might refer to TikTok users outside China.

[–] huginn@feddit.it 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah reading the article it seems like Douyin is where the people were disappearing and TikTok is where the videos were suppressed.

They're both owned by Bytedance out of Beijing so it's not really much of a distinction.

[–] 0x815@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] huginn@feddit.it 1 points 8 months ago

Authoritarian regimes often kidnap their own citizens in other countries, yes.

That's not really what we're talking about here though

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It will change who gets the data. Who would you rather have your data: US gov, or CCP?

For me its an easy choice; I dont tiktok.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Neither

Tik Tok and Meta and others must be sold to operate in the country I'm in.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 1 points 8 months ago

Tautalogically that is totally tautological.