this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
404 points (98.8% liked)

politics

19043 readers
4725 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

House Republicans lost another member in Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., on Friday. Gallagher's departure April 19 will leave Republicans with just one vote to spare on legislation.

Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., who announced last month he would not run for re-election, will resign from Congress early, he confirmed in a statement Friday.

Gallagher’s departure before the end of his term in January is another blow to Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and House Republicans, who have been struggling to govern and demonstrate stability in this Congress.

Two sources familiar with the matter told NBC News of Gallagher's plan to resign early Friday. The Wisconsin Republican then released a statement announcing that he will depart April 19.

The speaker's office confirmed that Gallagher informed Johnson of his decision earlier this week.

His resignation could cause more headaches for House Republicans. Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., who also is not seeking re-election, is resigning from Congress on Friday, cutting the GOP’s minuscule majority to 218-213. When Gallagher leaves, the majority would further shrink to 217-213, meaning Republicans could only afford a single defection on any vote if Democrats vote together.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 155 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Gallagher has a young family that he and his wife hope to grow and the House schedule is not conducive to that, the source said.

Dude is quitting Congress to have more time for sex. I can respect that.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 104 points 6 months ago (4 children)

My man just wants to creampie his wife, and republicans are all upset about it.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 61 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Honestly, good for him. I wish I could quit my job to focus on nutting in my wife.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

After almost 22 years of blissful marriage and passionate romance, nutting in your wife remains one of my favorite pastimes.

[–] showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I too enjoy nutting in your wife Hay yo!

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

It's wife nutting all the way down boys.

[–] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Why quit when you could just work from home? Multitasking!

[–] Cannibal_MoshpitV3@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How dare he focus on consensual reproduction in his married life instead of helping the GOP take away other women's right to decide otherwise?

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

They're just mad she's not a minor.

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 months ago

Which is honestly a most republican of desires.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

We would all like to creampie Gallagher's young wife on this glorious day!

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah it’s better than the microwaved watermelon I’m currently banging.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

lol they are there fewer months than I am at my job each year

[–] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 6 months ago

Nah, "spend more time with my family" is the standard excuse.

[–] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 147 points 6 months ago

Gallagher’s decision to leave April 19 also means that there will not be a special election to fill his seat. Under Wisconsin state law, vacancies after the second Tuesday in April are filled in the general election, so Gallagher’s replacement will be decided in November and his seat will remain empty until January.

If he resigns just a week earlier his seat would likely be filled by another republican. Credit where credit is due, this is an intentional move on his part to express dissatisfaction with house republicans.

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 98 points 6 months ago (3 children)

It makes you wonder if Ken Buck actually knew something when he said three more were resigning after him. It was written off as a hypothetical statement, yet here we are.

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 44 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The real question is did he know something or was it merely stating the obvious that rats abandon a sinking ship?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)

At this point it is most likely rats abandoning a sinking ship.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago

Note it’s just as question of how many of them are rats or lemmings (as portrayed by Disney).

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Are these the rats? Seems meaningful that I haven't heard of them as shitbags, even if they do vote in lockstep.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah what he knew is none of these people are qualified anymore. The thing about fucking education for decades is eventually those people have to lead the country, too. So anyone with a shred, and I mean a shred, of decency and sense is out. Because nothing is more frustrating when the bull has the reigns but it only chases red flags.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

He had to have known. Gallagher resigned a week after the deadline for a special election to be called to replace him, so there's no way that was coincidental

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 64 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How many pounds of shit do you think Mike Johnson has in his pants right now?
MTG voted to vacate and Gallagher resigns? Talk about a good day lol

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm having a great Friday, lol. Monday afternoon is going to be even better.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Monday we'll see if repo agents show up at Trump's property... it's so exciting!

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

It's like being excited for the next season premier of the show that scared us all

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

I think it's likely that the two things are connected. If nothing else, why would he want to stick around and watch the fifth [?] battle for the Speakership this year?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago

He was elected the same time as trump and has grown increasingly frustrated with his party.

So. Yeah.

[–] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 39 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well, Hakeem Jeffries will become speaker before the November elections. Ukraine might be getting some aid, which is what I want to see.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Yep, just keep on resigning, help our blue and yellow brothers and sisters!

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago

Remember Ken Buck saying that the next three resignations would upset republicans more than his own resignation did. Mike Gallagher today is one. Two to go. Who’s it gonna be?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Ok so two defectors takes it to 215-215. What happens with a tie?

[–] Vertelleus@sh.itjust.works 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What a tie vote means in the House. According to House rules, in the case of a tie vote, a question before the chamber "shall be lost." In the lower chamber, where Republicans hold just a slim majority and often see a handful of defections among their conference, there's no tie-breaker. Unlike in the Senate, where a tie-breaking vote may be cast, no one is brought in to resolve the issue.

Source

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Ok 3 defectors or 6 to leave to pass Democrat stuff. But more likely gridlock.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ties are the same as the vote failing in the House, there is no way to break ties.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Getting out while they can

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I'm looking forward to finding out what shitstorm is brewing, because this is a lot of early retirements with reasons that are normally used when they choose not to run again.

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not weird that they are resigning.

It's weird that they are doing it mid-term.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

The only remaining House Republicans will be the Feces Cockus.

load more comments (1 replies)

Lmao this is fuckin great

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (3 children)

There are so many GOP members resigning all at the same time, you just HAVE to expect they are all being blackmailed with Kompromat or something. It's just unlikely they ALL have better things to do suddenly.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 35 points 6 months ago

I think this is more of a "rats leaving a sinking ship" situation.

They see the writing on the wall & are trying to put some distance between them & the party before shit really hits the fan.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

They see trump taking over the rnc and they realize all the money that was going to flow into their campaigns is now being spent in whatever Trump wants.

No point in running if there's no cash to support your campaign.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'd it was kompromat that's be starting in Congress to fuck up any chance of a functioning government. This looks like even the assholes are getting tired of the smell of shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 6 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wis., who announced last month he would not run for re-election, will resign from Congress early, he confirmed in a statement Friday.

Gallagher’s departure before the end of his term in January is another blow to Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and House Republicans, who have been struggling to govern and demonstrate stability in this Congress.

Under Wisconsin state law, vacancies after the second Tuesday in April are filled in the general election, so Gallagher’s replacement will be decided in November and his seat will remain empty until January.

Earlier Friday, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., filed a motion to oust Johnson from the speakership over his handling of funding the government, though no vote is scheduled yet.

Meanwhile, shortly after the House passed its final government funding package for fiscal year 2024 on Friday, retiring Rep. Kay Granger, R-Texas, said she would step down as chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, setting off an early battle among Republicans to succeed her in the powerful post.

In his statement, Gallagher said he worked closely with GOP leaders on the timing of his announcement — shortly after the House voted to avert a shutdown — and looks forward to Johnson naming a new China committee chairman.


The original article contains 509 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›