this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
-12 points (35.7% liked)

politics

19047 readers
3931 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (2 children)

oh yes, because that never backfired at all.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Statistically this is always the right play, tho. Trump was an outlier.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If a statistical precedent is broken, you need to consider it’s no longer precedent.

MAGA is proving the old ways of doing things don’t work. New strategies are needed- like maybe picking better candidates.

Which, case in point, why would you then intentionally loose that vital data point if their votes?

[–] firebyte@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I was horrified when I first heard about this, though it actually seems to be a good strategy, if risky and ballsy:

Prop up an opposing candidate in the primary, who you project (the risky part) will poll worse against you in the general election.

It seems to be working...

https://youtu.be/K-UG88yoF0M?si=waPJ6WO29tQo2uJb

Given that Democrats this time around are out-fundraising the Republicans, it could be a really smart strategy.

https://democrats.org/news/rnc-statement-on-the-rncs-desperate-financial-situation/

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A Democratic group is wading into the Republican Senate primary in Ohio with a new television spot aimed at promoting the conservative credentials of Bernie Moreno, a Cleveland-area businessman who has been endorsed by former President Donald J. Trump.

A group called Duty and Country is spending roughly $2.7 million on the ad, which is set to run across the state, according to AdImpact, a firm that tracks advertising.

Mr. Moreno won their backing by embracing hard-line conservative positions that Democrats view as potentially easier to run against in a general election.

“When Ohio voters head to their polling place, they deserve to know the truth about Bernie Moreno — and the truth is that Moreno is a MAGA extremist who embraced Donald Trump just like he embraced his policies to ban abortion nationwide and repeal” the Affordable Care Act, said Hannah Menchhoff, a spokeswoman for Senate Majority PAC.

Republicans already are expected to gain one seat in West Virginia after Senator Joe Manchin III, a Democrat, announced he would not seek re-election.

In the California Senate primary last month, Representative Adam Schiff, a Democrat, ran a spot describing Steve Garvey, a Republican and a former Major League Baseball player, as too conservative.


The original article contains 485 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Corporate money ALWAYS slants to the right