this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
197 points (94.6% liked)

Linux

48323 readers
651 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How does it stack up against traditional package management and others like AUR and Nix?

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 8 months ago

I dont use insecure tools to install software

[–] scratchandgame@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (7 children)

I personally think it is trash..

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] XenBad@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

They’re great on certain desktops, like Fedora’s Atomic Desktops, but you usually have to work around Flatpak specific issues. On NixOS there doesn’t seem to be a declarative way to install them.

[–] teolan@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I love flatpaks and flathub. They're amazing for GUI apps, though there are still a couple of wrinkles that needs to be ironed out.

I would really love if it was better with regards to cli apps and developer tooling though. As someone that uses a lot of TUI apps that seriously limit how much I can use flatpak.

[–] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
[–] mfat@lemdro.id 1 points 8 months ago

I like them sonce they're easy to install and you can update all Flatpaks at once. But I don't likke the paths and run commands. Very unintuitive.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Flatpak works most of the time. Nix works almost all the time (except when stuff happens like the download fails)

Flatpak is free to assume anything about your system which is sometimes not compatible with NixOS

[–] Dehydrated@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It's pretty good for desktop apps, but it doesn't provide CLI applications, so I still have to rely on the AUR. There are some issues with it, but overall I think it's the best solution we currently have. And it's very easy to use, which is great for new users and it will become important if Linux continues growing like this.

[–] clemdemort@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (5 children)

It's the easiest solution to packaging software for Linux that doesn't mean it's good, In fact fhe way no dependencies are shared absolutely wrecks my hard drive and makes everything super long (downloading, updating, etc...).

Where it shines is security but to be honest do you really need an open source app to be in it's own secure sandbox?

I vastly prefer nix and I wish packaging stuff for it was easier.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I click install, app launches and I don't need to deal with dependency hell for it. (I like them)

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›