this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
489 points (93.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9777 readers
178 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Have you notice how the general opinion is that people getting hit by cars somehow deserved it? My best friend was hit by a text-and-drive kindof woman. He was an athlete and now he can't walk more than a few hundred meters.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 63 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I think you've gone off the rails a bit. This could have been an interesting retrospective about how jaywalking actually became criminalized, for example.

[–] Fudoshin@feddit.uk 41 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] explodicle@local106.com 9 points 8 months ago

We just legalized jaywalking here in California and it's suuuuper convenient. They should legalize it everywhere.

[–] papabobolious@feddit.nu 6 points 8 months ago

They always miss that part

[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's the same principle. It's the idea that the flow of traffic must go on and that people convenience are more important than anything else - climate, public spaces, pollution, freedom to use the vehicle you want, even people's life.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zikeji@programming.dev 51 points 8 months ago (11 children)

No, I haven't heard this "general opinion". Any conversation I've been a part of or observed (which, to be fair, is less than a few dozen) has always defaulted to the driver being at fault.

I'm not sure where you live that the general opinion is victim blaming, but it doesn't sound like a pleasant place.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Fallenwout@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

My policy is: if you are weaker, you have to be extra carefull and give way to the others.

Usually in this order: pedestrian < bicycle < motorcycle < car < truck

This has served me well. No reason to risk your life in competing even if you are in the right. Being in the right serves you nothing when you're dead.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

Yes, everyone should take precautions to keep themselves safe. Everyone should also advocate for safer roads and stiff penalties for vehicular violence.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You must always exercise safety and pragmatism, but that doesn't mean that the "stronger" vehicle deserves the right of way more. I'd argue that the more dangerous the vehicle is, the greater the obligation to operate it with care and due regard for others.

[–] indepndnt@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I think both are true.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 15 points 8 months ago

I mean, it makes sense from a self-preservation point of view. Too many are upholding this exact policy while driving though, which is what I'm pointing out. One could argue that the heavier / more dangerous you are, the more careful you want to be as well.

[–] w2tpmf@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Being in the right serves you nothing when you're dead.

My Dad taught me this concept at a young. He called it being "dead right".

Yes you're right, yes they're in the wrong. You're still dead.

So don't worry about other people doing it right, worry about yourself and your own safety.

[–] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

In the ocean, this is called the law of gross tonnage. Don't count on the tanker yielding to your sailboat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"I had the right of way" makes a terrible headstone slogan.

[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What about "I almost run over a cyclist so he attacked me with a hammer?". One can only be so tolerant toward the constant threat of vehicular assault.

Hell I almost got ran over by some bitch a couple of days ago while walking on the sidewalk.

[–] ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I'm not saying or suggesting that it's a pedestrian, cyclist, driver, or anyone else's sole responsibility to stay safe. In fact, I strongly believe the "stronger" party has an outsized responsibility to make sure they act safely and not endanger other road users.

All I'm advocating for is for all participants to be vigilant and not assume right of way will be honored by the other party.

Ultimately, only you can keep you safe. Don't assume anyone is flawless. Regardless of where you are driving a car, walking, cycling, etc. people can and will make mistakes, miss something, or forget to check.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Exactly. laws are not armour. They are simply a deterrent at best.

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My ex girlfriend was like that. There was this piece of road when entering the city where pedestrians could cross the road. It was symbolised by some waves on the road (because it was over a bridge that's why i guess) my girlfriend would always yell at me or the pedestrians that we (in the car) come first. I don't know how true that was, she said she asked someone. And the conversation was always that i don't care, because i'm not running over people.
She would always accelerate or honk or yell out of the window. Congratulations, now you sit over there in traffic instead of back here. And you only had to endanger 10 people

[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 9 points 8 months ago

:s I hope she calmed down. Even for herself I guess it shouldn't be good for blood pressure

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I am so sorry for your friend.

Too many people live in la-la-it-cant-happen-to-me-land and take that attitude with them behind the wheel. I think that to qualify for a drivers license one should be required to watch car crash footage and see pictures of the aftermath like you do in a good forklift safety video, because people really do not understand the relative forces involved with moving at a high rate of speed.

Does it look like your friend will ever recover his mobility?

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)
[–] squid_slime@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago

We need this stuff on YouTube ads nowadays and such.

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago

I dont like to swear on this platform but holy shit! That goes hard!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Hey I am a Dreamy Pedestrian. Should I be scared?

[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 11 points 8 months ago

Yes. Always look left and right before crossing the street <3

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Are you vague? Too vague, even?

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's weird that I can't tell which side this is advocating for

[–] CaptainProton@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Why does there need to be one clear side?

It's not like there aren't total idiots both inside and outside of cars.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] wildcherry@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 months ago

I always wondered who was this Jay guy :D

[–] Lath@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ask not of others what you will not or cannot do yourself.

[–] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Too vague.. ARREST THEM!

load more comments
view more: next ›