this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
22 points (92.3% liked)

Linux and Tech News

2440 readers
81 users here now

This is where all the News about Linux and Linux adjacent things goes. We'll use some of the articles here for the show! You can watch or listen at:

You can also get involved at our forum here on Lemmy:

Or just get the most recent episode of the show here:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 5 points 2 days ago

You can ask it anything... Ask it to fuck off.

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago
[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 19 points 3 days ago (3 children)

What the fuck does that even mean, "AI browsing"?

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is an AI browser war going on right now, see Comet (Perplexity), Atlas (ChatGPT), Claude AI Agent from Chrome etc.

They work by letting the AI continuously see everything your browser can see, such as your emails, banking details, financial habits, online shopping accounts, etc.

By doing so, they promise to be better digital assistants, so that you ask just ask the browser to do tasks such as online shopping, booking holidays, etc.

Even ignoring the severe privacy concerns, AI browsers are significantly prone to prompt injection. That is, any random webpage with hidden text can override the instructions you give it to carry out malicious attacks.

[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the explanation. I hate it.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Prolly like if you look up something that doesn't actually exist, it'll find you results anyways.

This ought to be fun for Rule 34...

[–] riskable@programming.dev -5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Today, when you search for something you get a handful of ads, SEO-optimized bullshit, and maybe the 6th link will be what you were actually looking for.

When you tell the AI agent (in your browser) to search for something, not only do you get the most relevant results (because you can make your prompt vastly more specific and detailed), you completely skip all that other stuff that you didn't want.

I've been saying for some time now that AI is going to kill free search engines because it's such a better way to search for stuff. Free search engines like Google and SEO-optimizing companies are hindrances to efficient browsing and drowning the web in bullshit. Poisoning search results.

An AI agent will skip past all that stuff and give you just what you want; you never see any ads!

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

An AI agent will skip past all that stuff and give you just what you want; you never see any ads!

You're wondering, "Why is my cat sneezing?"

While you ponder that, why not treat yourself to something delicious? At Carl's Jr., our Charbroiled Burgers are made with 100% Angus beef, grilled to perfection, and packed with bold flavors. Treat yourself today—you deserve a meal that satisfies!

Now, back to your question: Sneezing in cats can be caused by allergies, respiratory infections, or irritants. It’s always a good idea to consult with your veterinarian to ensure your feline friend is healthy.

Let me know if you have more questions!

[–] riskable@programming.dev -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You've obviously never used an open source AI model (running locally on your PC) if you think that's how it'd go.

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Likewise, a properly set up and locally hosted searx instance should not be returning ads and "SEO-optimized bullshit". You're comparing "free" corporate owned services to privately owned ones. OFC corporate owned is going to feed you ads.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 16 hours ago

The takeaway here is: Open source doesn't suffer from enshittification.

Learn and contribute to FOSS or stop bitching 🤣

[–] JandroDelSol@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

ah yes, because there's no way the programmers won't induce bias in their AIs

[–] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 16 hours ago

If you don't like your current open source AI, just use a different one or an embedding that works around whatever bias you don't like. Maybe open a ticket?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's assuming the AI won't look at the results and still make shit up. I've used AI-assisted search and i know that it's not reliable.

[–] riskable@programming.dev -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok how would that work:

find me some good recipes for hibachi style ginger butter

AI model returns 10 links, 4 of which don't actually exist (because it hallucinated them)? No. If they didn't exist, it wouldn't have returned them because it wouldn't have been able to load those URLs.

It's possible that it could get it wrong because of some new kind of LLM scamming method but that's not "making shit up" it's malicious URLs.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they didn’t exist, it wouldn’t have returned them

And yet I've had Bing's Copilot/ChatGPT (with plugins like Consensus), Gemini, and Perplexity do exactly that, but worse. Sometimes they'll cite sources that don't mention anything related to the answer they've provided because the information they're giving is based on some other training data they can't source. They were asked to provide a source, but won't necessarily give you the source. Hell, sometimes they'll answer an adjacent just to spit out an answer--any answer--to fulfill the request.

LLMs are simply not the appropriate tool for the job. This is most obvious when you need the specificity and accuracy.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah... The big commercial models have system prompts that fuck it all up. That's my hypothesis, anyway.

You have to try it with an open source model. You tell it to turn the titles, URLs, and nothing else. That seems to work fantastic 👍

I'm doing it with Open WebUI and ollama cloud which is open source models that you could run locally—if you have like $5,000 worth of hardware.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Interesting. I have a couple automations in mind, I'll have to try it out, then.

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 days ago

An AI agent will skip past all that stuff and give you just what you want; you never see any ads!

You're wondering, "Why is my cat sneezing?"

While you ponder that, why not treat yourself to something delicious? At Carl's Jr., our Charbroiled Burgers are made with 100% Angus beef, grilled to perfection, and packed with bold flavors. Treat yourself today—you deserve a meal that satisfies!

Now, back to your question: Sneezing in cats can be caused by allergies, respiratory infections, or irritants. It’s always a good idea to consult with your veterinarian to ensure your feline friend is healthy.

Let me know if you have more questions!

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Who the fuck asked for a Firefox AI browsing mode?

[–] zib@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Dunno, but I'll be asking for a way to completely disable it.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 8 points 3 days ago

Probably LibreWolf.

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

Which they will provide without being asked for it.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 11 points 3 days ago

Mozilla needs to die and be reborn under the wing of better management and community drive, because they seem to have been captured by money hungry fucks. They dont give a shit about opensource. It's just a pipe through which they can get Google money.

[–] Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 days ago

Are they jonesing for openai giving them another google-sized payout? Otherwise I don't get the rationale, the overlap of their users and people wanting ai browser is one freshman from California? Not to mention Firefox has nowhere near enough cash to burn on this thing to compete with AI companies doing the exact same thing.

(obligatory "ai, ew")

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Ewww. Talk about being tone deaf with their userbase…

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

With their user base, or with this particular social media bubble we're in right now?

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You probably already live in some sort of bubble if you're a Firefox user. Most people straight up don't care about the things Firefox offers, and what it offers (better privacy, a functioning extension system including adblockers) is diametrically opposed to using LLMs IMO.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can have fully private AI, it can run locally on your own computer with no data leaving it. This is one of the things I'm looking forward to from Firefox AI support, since other browsers come from organizations that have their own AI they'd rather you use instead of local ones.

I have no idea how this would interfere with the extension system, or adblockers in particular. They're completely separate things.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I suppose it's fundamentally an issue of trust, and in recent years Mozilla did a lot to erode that. Even if an AI could theoretically be private and local, I'm not willing to believe that it's actually going to be.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

Firefox is open source, you can see for yourself what it's doing. You don't have to trust them.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They made a version of windows after 2000?

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, that's Windows 11 - older version than 2000. The good one was 1736.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago

Fun fact about 1736, it was the birth year of Patrick Henry, who famously said “Give me liberty, or give me death!”

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I wonder if I could use this to just browse for me. like 24 hour, round the clock browsing. see a link, click the link. see an ad, click the ad.

just really fuck up all their metrics.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

Auto-clicking ads to fuck up metrics is already a thing: https://adnauseam.io/

[–] leo@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 1 points 2 days ago

You're on to something here.

[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

And it's gonna be shiiit

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] DoctorPress@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fireshit prefers to make their shits on by default and can only be disabled in about:config

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yep. That's already how the current "AI" (called "machine learning" in the options to make it more confusing) functionality in Firefox works, you need to go into about:config to turn it all off. Y'know, because it's such a niche thing to want when you're using a somewhat privacy-focused webbrowser.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago
[–] Gnugit@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago

Uninstalled

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works -2 points 3 days ago

i like mullvad's browser