this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2025
18 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

3432 readers
14 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice ๐Ÿ‰.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In your brain, or if you listen to a song and the same song delayed for a moment?

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] cynar@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Most areas of our brain can only do 1 task at a time. If you try and do more, it flips rapidly between them. Basically, you would "watch" vaguely 30-50% of each show, with your brain trying to fill in the gaps.

Interestingly, you can do 2 tasks that don't share significant resources. This is how you can both drive a car and listen to a podcast. It's also why you suddenly need to turn down the music when you need to navigate, or park. Those require use of general cognition, which the music/podcast was using.

An interesting example of this is time keeping. Some people can talk and keep an accurate mental timer. However they will lose track when looking at images. Others will be the reverse, or something different.

It turns out that humans don't have a consistent time keeping mental circuit. We hijack other systems. If you "hear" the time passing, you will struggle to also hear someone talking without issues. If you visualise a clock, you can talk, but your visual cognition is now occupied.

[โ€“] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wow, this is really interesting, thanks for the summation.

If I wanted to read more (say entry level stuff), would you have a recommendation?

[โ€“] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, I don't have any links to hand. It's mostly pop sci level stuff I've picked up from various places.

The time one I want to say was Richard Feynman. Though an informal experiment on fellow professors in the lunch room. Possibly from his autobiography, which is an excellent read either way.

[โ€“] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 2 days ago

Well, Feynman's a start anyway. Thanks!

[โ€“] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago

You cannot. If you tried youโ€™d just be watching one and then the other, with your brain interpolating between takes.

[โ€“] Oka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 days ago

Try it, for science. Then try and recall b o th shows separately.

[โ€“] TootSweet@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You'd process each of them less than half as well as if you'd watched it on its own?

You're not gonna remember them both particularly well.

Source: I split my laptop screen into pieces with video and games, and both suffer for it

Take lots of stimulant beforehand, and maybe slow down each shows' playback by 10-20%, I see no problem with this pass-time (I would get a headache after 3 minutes or so of trying, especially so if they were completely different shows, or are both from a show I have not seen yet).

[โ€“] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 4 days ago

When "multitasking", the brain rapidly switches between processing the different tasks.