this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
-35 points (22.2% liked)

Privacy

32120 readers
301 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
-35
Thoughts? (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 9 months ago by miwel to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyberfae@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)
  1. Why is this a video and not a text post? Especially one with low quality and out of context animations.
  2. When making a claim, always link your sources.
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Probably something that was made for or found on 4chan.

[–] montar@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've spent a great deal of time on 4chan and i can say that both content and style matches.

[–] WbrJr@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I am sorry for that experience.

[–] montar@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

It's much easier to pick out their lingo than to speak in it. That's why people like Frederick Brennan are so interesting. If you have the chance to read something biographical about him, I would jump at that chance.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago

In general, you shouldn't trust something that presents a wild assertion and a vague thing you can Google search for more information. It comes with an implied "do your own research" which comes with its own implied "...intil your research agrees with what I believe"

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

My biggest thought:

Anybody who posts "thoughts" and leaves is deeply untrustworthy, and any replies should be in spite of their concern trolling

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 9 months ago

After snowden, probably true.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 months ago

Just as i thought, posted by a 2 day old account. Better then the image throwup of 4 chan posts i guess but still dumb af

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Whats about the rng/RSA thing? Any information greatly appreciated.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 1 points 9 months ago

Remember most of that but not the cleptographic backdoor, thanks!

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Well, the US free market religion ensures that everything in the US are based on 100% profit and corruption. All big tech both bow to, and participate in the US 'deep state'. I have zero direct clue about the claims here, but we know that liberal big tech goes for profit whenever they can (rare cases force).

As an example: The RAND corporation is a think thank that are deeply linked to deep state and the military industrial complex + US attacks around the world They work on time scales of decades and try to grow US Capitalist hegemony by all means possible. RAND have been the main architects of most of US foreign policy (incl. Ukraine/Russia and Taiwan/China and all 'color revolutions') for many many years. RAND had a board member in openai (forgot her name) while all the scheming/firing went on.

Now, nobody knows anything for sure, but Rand doesn't sit there for their joy, or for instant profit, they sit there to observe/control the development of openai's products, and make sure it is used primarily for US hegemonic goals. Deep state (who/whatever they turn out to be) have huge control of all US corporations and also sit on all the big media and therefore the narrative. It would imho be naive to believe that the psychopathic US elite haven't at least tried the claims in this meme. How successful is another matter tho.