this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)

Games

22043 readers
265 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This has nothing to do with games, despite being a game studio. This is more a business thing.

[–] misk@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ubisoft is a video game publisher.

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah but they’re not very good at it

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True, but when it reports earnings is entirely unrelated to how it produces games.

[–] misk@piefed.social 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They make games to make money so it does seem very related.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The gaming market for investors is very different than the gaming market for players. I'd expect to see this in an investing community, not a community that talks about games.

[–] misk@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If this was a regular quarterly report I’d agree but Ubisoft ownership structure drama will likely have impact on their output and livelihoods of their employees.

Maybe reporting the actual results and the stock price impact could be relevant if it's significant, but even then it's a bit of a stretch. Posting that their half-year report is delayed is a nothing burger.

[–] Flaqueman@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 week ago

The people making games and the people making earning calls are not the same people. Stop Ubi-bashing