this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
712 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19126 readers
3383 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hillary Clinton is warning about the legality of birth control in the wake of a decision by the Alabama Supreme Court that found frozen embryos created through fertility treatments are children under state law.

“They came for abortion first. Now it’s [in vitro fertilization], and next it’ll be birth control,” the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee and secretary of State said in a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

“The extreme right won’t stop trying to exert government control over our most sacred personal decisions until we codify reproductive freedom as a human right,” Clinton added.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 95 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It only makes sense that the club that's been pushing abstinence only sex ed for however many years would move to ban birth control. After all, birth control is for sinners.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

The same folks bemoaning birth control have endorsed state sterilization and euthanasia policies in the very recent past.

So much of this shit is just White Replacement hysterics with a legislative knife. The fixation on skin tone as a defining moral indicator has been the poison pill gagging this country since it was founded.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

It only makes sense that the club that's been pushing abstinence only sex ed for however many years would move to ban birth control. After all, birth control is for sinners.

There is also a contingent among conservatives who have been taught that birth control is tantamount to abortion. They think that since if an egg WERE to become fertilized it might not implant because of the birth control, that’s an abortion. (Even though as I understand it this secondary mechanism isn’t proven in hormonal BC.)

(As I got older and experienced the world I became far less conservative. My sister became more conservative. So I get to learn some of the crazy firsthand.)

[–] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 73 points 9 months ago (14 children)

The extreme right won’t stop trying to exert government control over our most sacred personal decisions

It's not the extreme right, this is mainstream for conservatives. The extreme right is the one calling for eg. the extermination of gender / sexual minorities or non-whites (and the extremists aren't nearly as rare as people generally like to think)

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

It's not the extreme right, this is mainstream for conservatives.

You're both right and wrong: the Republican mainstream has become extreme. Fascism, anarcho-capitalism and bizarre combinations of the two contradictory ideologies are extreme no matter how common they become.

The extreme right is the one calling for eg. the extermination of gender / sexual minorities

That's already a pretty mainstream view/goal in the GOP. Most of them are just using coded language rather than outright saying it yet.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 66 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (47 children)

Next women will have to marry their rapist.
Remember the anti abortion bullshit is from the same book, that mandates women marry their rapist!

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 52 points 9 months ago (2 children)

And after birth control women are going to be fined for having their periods, because each period is supposed to be a god blessed baby for Christ's sake. THINK OF THE CHILDREN YOU HEATHENS!

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Teaching them a lesson for leaving the kitchen. Seriously though, woman (and men) fought hard for their rights to their body. Now, they have less freedom. If they aren't careful they could lose much more of it like in Afghanistan.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 9 months ago

The more this develops the more I think it's actually "replacement theory" bullshit. Religion is the only "acceptable" avenue to push this from as they know the majority of the population has no patience whatsoever for any disgusting discussion about "too many dark skinned people." so they stick to "what God intended."

I think they believe that white people get abortions and use contraception more than minorities so if they outlaw that then white people can't become the minority population as they're forced to carry to birth every fertilized egg.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 39 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I was on the BC pill for years before I was ever sexually active - my periods were so heavy that I became severely anemic and sick.

Literally the pill and some prescription iron tablets for a time were all I needed, none of the other shit I was given for months before 1 woman doctor thought to prick my finger and see if the drop of blood sunk in the solution or not.

It pretty much stayed towards the top.

I had to drop 2 classes that semester as a result. I was so pissed.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 37 points 9 months ago (17 children)

“That’s why I’m pushing for an actual democratic primary and supporting progressive populist candidates and their broadly approved policies such as minimum wage increases and universal health care,” Ms Clinton did not add to her remarks.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lol nah they're using the tried and true strategy of...checks notes using actual fascists to bully people into voting for slightly less fascist candidates. Bold strategy, Cotton, let's see if it pays off twice.

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (15 children)

What's the better play? Voting for third party candidates tends to split the vote and empower the farther right candidates, no?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] WishOnSuckaWood@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

She didn't need to mention anything about a primary because the push to criminalize abortion is coming at the state and local levels. Vote for progressive local representation and that will do lot more than Biden ever could

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At least she wasn't completely useless for this and actually said the word abortion. I haven't heard much from democrats suggesting or pushing any policy or solutions to this crisis. They seem to just leave the field open to let the republicans dominate the discussion.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (12 children)

They treat it the same as Republicans did, a talking point to rally around. That is, until the Republicans actually did something and stacked the Supreme Court. They could have codified roe when Obama was president, but I don't think they even tried or considered the possibility that roe would be overturned.

Now that roe has been killed, women have shifted significantly blue. Why the hell would they actually fix the issue when they can campaign on it for the next decade at least?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago (4 children)

No kidding. IIRC, Trollito and Coke-can Clarence both signaled they hate that right as well as a few others...so tired of these creepy weirdos having so much undue influence over this country. They don't represent any kind of majority.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's why John Oliver's offer to that aforementioned coke-cantard makes a lot of sense.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 21 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Soon jacking off will be a crime

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

I mean they are literally passing laws which require attaching your real name to your porn habits. So yeah, I'd say it is 100% the goal to leak this stuff and eventually, openly persecute people for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson:

It scans all the activity on your phone, or your devices, your laptop, what have you; we do all of it,” Johnson told the panel about the app

It sends a report to your accountability partner. My accountability partner right now is Jack, my son. He’s 17. So he and I get a report about all the things that are on our phones, all of our devices, once a week. If anything objectionable comes up, your accountability partner gets an immediate notice. I’m proud to tell ya, my son has got a clean slate.”

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/mike-johnson-son-monitor-porn-intake-covenant-eyes-1234870634/

[–] Zink@programming.dev 9 points 9 months ago

Ahh yeah. Nothing has helped my relationship with my son like cold distant surveillance.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

My accountability partner right now is Jack, my son. He’s 17

Ah yes, I'm sure a 17 year old teenager has found absolutely no way to watch porn other than his (now infected) phone. Nope. No siree.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

These people won't stop till its literally illegal to be naked by yourself without some homely chapped-ass chaperone

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ButWhatDoesItAllMean@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] ConfusedPossum@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

May the Lord open

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Condoms used to only be legal for married couples.

Get ready. As long as conservatives have any power at all, they will use it to oppress the normal people. They always have.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IamRoot@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

She is 100% correct.

But she is not helping. She can’t help. She is not liked. At all.

[–] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Same problem with Al Gore warning against climate change. He was right, but because of who he was he was instantly dismissed but all conservatives and even some liberals.

Sometimes, it's better to have enough self awareness to let someone else speak for you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Don't really need her to say it when the Supreme Court justices said it themselves.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What is next after they ban birth control? Forcing women to get pregnancy tests every month in order to detect miscarriage or abortion later on?

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Probably prison (or the death penalty ) for women who miscarry, I remember reading some states Alabama tried passing legislation so when a women has a miscarriage the authorities investigate her for murder.

load more comments
view more: next ›