this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
712 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2537 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hillary Clinton is warning about the legality of birth control in the wake of a decision by the Alabama Supreme Court that found frozen embryos created through fertility treatments are children under state law.

“They came for abortion first. Now it’s [in vitro fertilization], and next it’ll be birth control,” the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee and secretary of State said in a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter.

“The extreme right won’t stop trying to exert government control over our most sacred personal decisions until we codify reproductive freedom as a human right,” Clinton added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Lol nah they're using the tried and true strategy of...checks notes using actual fascists to bully people into voting for slightly less fascist candidates. Bold strategy, Cotton, let's see if it pays off twice.

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

What's the better play? Voting for third party candidates tends to split the vote and empower the farther right candidates, no?

[–] variaatio@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

There not being a better play doesn't mean that play is a good one. It is a bad play, just the least bad one. What it means the system overall is broken and careening ro a crash, since the actually good plays are not politically viable. Mind you not that they wouldn't be voter viable, but the gatekeepers who get to choose what is put in front of voters viably don't want them there, that kind of politically non viable.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think it was an American who said it that if people lose faith in the ballot box, they'll take the soap box, if that fails, they will go for an ammo box. I think progressives seem to be at station 2, while the far right is skipping right to station 3.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

I think progressives seem to be at station 2

Yeah because it's hard for many of them to believe moderates would rather lose to fascists than compromise with progressives and leftists.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

Depends on the electoral map

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That's what I'm planning on doing. People will be able to see my vote for a 3rd party or write in candidate. I'm not going to reward Biden for refusing to compromise with leftists and progressives. Moderates are the majority voting bloc and got him elected in the 2020 primaries. They will take the lions share of the responsibility when he loses in the 2024 general.

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

So you'll help elect Trump to show everyone how pure you are and then tell the moderates it was their fault? That sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your face. Trump WILL hurt you and the causes you care about in a worse and more permanent way than the alternative. Yes the choices are shit. There's still a meaningful choice.

Edit: Maybe a better way to ask the question would be what would you need to be able to sign on to the less shitty choice, keeping in mind that too much leaning in your direction will shear off the more conservative moderates at the other end of the Democratic coalition. There is strength in unity. Unions teach us that.

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

90% of these people are right wing trolls, trying to repeat the 2016 GOP traitor's playbook. The more you engage with them, the more opportunities they have to spread this nonsense.

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Yeah, that's right. I don't mean to feed the trolls so thanks for the prompt. I just figure some might just be young, immortal, angry, traumatized and idealistic and not able to appreciate the negative consequences of their proposed actions.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So you’ll help elect Trump to show everyone how pure you are and then tell the moderates it was their fault?

As someone who is a part of a wing which is too small for moderates to bother compromising with it's impossible for me to help Trump. Moderates have been very clear that my views and vote don't matter. Are they wrong?

That sounds like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Have you said that to moderates who refuse to compromise with leftists and progressives?

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There is strength in unity.

What unity? There were a wide range of progressive and leftist candidates running in the primaries. Moderates said "fuck all that we're going with this old guy who's gonna block strikes and support genocide".

Moderates would rather lose to fascists than compromise with leftists or progressives.

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I just hope some semblance of democracy can continue as imperfect as it is.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Then you best get on the moderates for being uncompromising pieces of shit.

[–] VubDapple@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

...some men aren't looking for anything logical, like money. They can't be bought, bullied, reasoned, or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

Michael Caine

Tags: criminals, evil, insanity, the-dark-knight

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it is clearly the moderates holding the party hostage here...

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

They're the majority voting bloc in the party. That means they hold the lion's share of the responsibility yes.