this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2025
156 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

76628 readers
2981 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago

Because doing damage in any way possible is good for a Russian asset

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 100 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also: “To make money”

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically a TLD is still a domain, just the top-level one.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Technically the toppest level domain is the root one, which has an empty label. That's why truly FQDNs and with a period.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I owned that domain once.

[–] naticus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yep, I manage a lot of domains for my organization and our members, and work on our and infrastructure regularly. I basically always end all DNS queries with a period to ensure Windows or Linux aren't trying to append anything like a search domain and screwing with my results. Fixes so many issues, especially when you're expecting an NXDOMAIN result.

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Zier@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

CouchHub.gov

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Which stands for top level what?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Top level domain. ".com" ".gov" etc. are top level domains. The headline is slightly incorrect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-level_domain

[–] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Hope this doesnt affect other .gov domains, like .gov.fr, .gov.nz or .gov.br

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It won't

This is about the .gov TLD, you're talking about the .br and .nz TLDs. Domains go in importance from right to left.

However, icann is still US based, he might try and take control of that and truly break the Internet in pieces

[–] nottelling@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it does not.

.gov.fr. is a subdomain of .fr., unrelated to .gov..

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

It's also unused, as far as I know.

[–] naticus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Can confirm what the other commenter said, completely impossible to have an effect. .com and .gov and .fr and .nz are what's called TLDs or Top Level Domains. Everything is delegated down from that level for any subdomains. .fr and .nz are country owned and any attempt to take control of that would be returned to their respective governments by ICANN.

Why would it? The article merely mentions that he's posting his nonsense on existing .gov domains, which is something he can totally do as the President.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As long as he doesn't hijack . I don't care.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Not hijack but he could disturb it. When US based organizations (afaik 9 out of 12) who run root dns servers change their root-file he could force ISPs in the US to ignore root servers that don't cooperate. Or Microsoft to update Windows with modified root hints . Or force Google or Cloudflare to do so for their resolvers. Or AWS for their services...

It wouldn't stop anyone to ignore said changes and it would be discovered pretty fast. But he could censor the internet and users who don't care or don't have the knowledge. Or if you rely on a service who didn't react (gmail anyone?)

Even DNSSec wouldn't help as he would control the start of the chain of trust.

There are a lot of infrastructure and involved companies based in the US. I don't say it's hopeless but don't underestimate the chaos he could evoke.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Government uses government website. More at 8.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Using it to insert AI generated propaganda onto official government websites is a brand new thing that’s never been done before

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The only thing new about it is the AI.

[–] BussyCat@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

There is literally a law that prevented things like posting “this shutdown is caused by radical left democrats” on the banner of official governement websites

It has literally never been done before

You can make an argument for some amount of propaganda that lives in everything but nobody ever posted a picture of a bag of cocaine and used it to blame a previous president….

This is magnitudes above anything that was done before it’s like comparing casual trash talk to sucker punching

You are correct. It is drilled into every us gov employee that you can't even hint to political messaging on any official documents presentations or social media for public service. The us gov resources serve the American people, not the politicians. It's strictly illegal, there are no grey area for interpretation.