this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
408 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

76648 readers
3286 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

640x360. They claim it's 480p. Maybe oy half-interlaces? Hah

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 5 days ago (2 children)

"Doorbell with a subscription" is something so utterly stupid, an absolute misdevelopment.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 5 days ago (6 children)

The fuck does it even need a subscription for, anyway? Is it not hosting the videos locally? Fuck that.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 66 points 6 days ago (8 children)

From the listing:

Answer your door from anywhere in the world with this remote viewing Video Doorbell.

So I assume you're not expected to self-host this. Which means they have to run and maintain servers. And $16/person ain't covering the cost of this device + servers indefinitely.

[–] vodka@feddit.org 36 points 6 days ago

It's a rebranded Tuya doorbell. So there aren't any subscriptions, though you will be giving them all your data.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 20 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Which means they have to run and maintain servers.

I'd bet money that it works just like similar devices from Reolink. Local recording to SD Card or NVR. If you want cloud recording then you're paying a monthly subscription.

This device from Aldi is at a very low pricepoint but it's specs are garbage. 480p recording? In 2025? C'mon...

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

you can make very cheap to maintain peer to peer solutions

you can use a STUN server to discover your public IP and use a method called UDP hole punching to open a port others can connect to. STUN servers are very cheap to run: they don’t actually handle the data; just provide a kind of handshake service in the middle for coordinating

this is often used for peer to peer video chat etc

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure you can. Do you think that's what they expect their users to do? Or that it's something they're going to facilitate?

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 1 points 4 days ago

there are public STUN servers: just like DNS, STUN is a fairly critical part of modern infrastructure

peer to peer real time video is a fairly solved problem. the fact that we have google/amazon/zoom/etc in the middle isn’t because it’s necessary

that having been said, STUN servers are also incredibly cheap to run… i wouldn’t consider it exactly off the cards for a company that’s selling products to support a public STUN server indefinitely… it’s not quite as simple as them having to pay tens of thousands /mo in infrastructure costs to keep the lights on: it’s more like $100/mo, which at numbers that small you’d make back in just interest on the sales you made… but i reckon it could go something like “support for 10 years” and then they release an update that lets you set your own STUN server; perhaps defaulting to a public, free one

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

any chance this can be done through your router/modem, where your phone app connects to external ip of router and is the "server end point" for your doorbell?

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

In general yes, but that's also how you easily end up on sites like insecam and shodan.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago

I mean it's certainly possible, it's just a matter of whether the doorbell firmware/software will support it. And the answer is almost always no.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Stop putting bloody cameras bloody everywhere bloody hell!

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

Especially IoT ones controlled by massive corporations

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 days ago

I always thought it would be cool to have a doorbell that, when pressed, would flash a red light on the person standing there and then a machine voice would say 'Target Acquired'.

[–] bluesocks@lemmings.world 11 points 6 days ago
[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago (5 children)

how about i dont need a video doorbell and i can use my eyeballs and look out the window

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Good luck doing that in my place.

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i get it that tech is cool and stuff, but as ive gotten older, ive learned not to rely on it as much

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Yeah, but you literally cannot see where the doorbell is at my place. It's a physical impossibility. I live on the second floor of a two flat with an enclosed entryway. No window anywhere in the building can see who rang the doorbell. Glad that works for you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›