this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
285 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

43114 readers
966 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A very, very helpful article to help get people we fight with to understand why this is important for anyone and everyone. Send this to friends and family.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I explained this to my boss the other day about the cameras he picked up for his house. He was like, “I don’t have anything that I care about them collecting.” To which I mentioned the fact that they now know:

  • Where he lives
  • What he looks like
  • How many devices are on the network
  • How many/how old his kids are
  • What times they are home
  • What types of food they have delivered and how often
  • Who they have as guests and how often

The list goes on. There are so many things people can find out about you when you don’t make it easy. Putting a 3rd party camera in your house, though? Now you’re just handing it over.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder how they'd react if you started a profile on them of them of the plates of the car they drive, eating habits, personality, their address, and whatever other observations and public records you can find then posted them around the office for everyone to see.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s a company of less than 10. I’d just be fired.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

True haha. Is funny though that lot of those "I have nothing to hide" types react when privacy is actually invaded and publicized as opposed to being theoretical. Even that they wear clothes and don't keep bathroom stalls wide open shows they want privacy.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

While I agree with the sentiment, let's just go down that list:

  • Where he lives: DMV and taxes cover that
  • What he looks like: DMV covers that
  • How many devices are on the network: The vast majority of people have no reason to care about that. Hell. I am not even sure I are about that
  • How many kids he has and their ages: Taxes and social security
  • What times they are home: Their internet usage patterns and likely cell towers logging their sim cards
  • What types of food they have delivered and how often: Traffic cameras and asking uber eats or whatever. Although... this goes back to "how important is this data?"
  • Guest info: See above regarding sim cards

I 100% agree it is important to be aware of what data a given device/vulnerability has access to. It is ALSO important to figure out if that is actually any new data being available and to think about what orgs/agencies would be a concern.

Because maybe you DO care about the principle of it (I know I do). But "It is the principle of the matter" is just as ineffective an argument as "I have nothing to hide".

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

These are all things that would need to be individually tracked down or requested and in government-controlled databases. It’s not just the government that has that data now. It’s the camera manufacturer and their 800 partners. And it’s all in one place.

It’s data that individually may not be important to you specifically, but combined, that’s enough information to easily start manipulating you, whether it’s directly or through advertising.

It’s not just about what data is collected, but also who has access.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Where he lives: DMV and taxes cover that What he looks like: DMV covers that How many devices are on the network: The vast majority of people have no reason to care about that. Hell. I am not even sure I are about that How many kids he has and their ages: Taxes and social security

When people ask me 'are you hiding from the government' it's almost hilarious to me. I pay local taxes on property, I send the government tax forms every year, I vote prolifically in local and national elections. I have a calling and letter writing 'campaign' for my representatives to know just how much they are screwing up. I go to protests. If I were a person of interest, they'd come visit.

However, there is no requirement to overshare with anyone, and that's where I am. I am not 'hiding' from anyone. I'm just pretty stingy with my data. Now, I realize there are some who must hide from their government, but to date, that's not really in my threat model.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 5 points 1 week ago

Most of those things you mentioned are government databases, not public knowledge.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I get your point, but the fact that the data is available elsewhere isn't really an argument for allowing another vector to collect the data (and also cross verify it).

There's more of an argument if there's not really another choice, say buying a new car that doesn't collect data isn't really an option since they all do it on some level. You either buy a car or not.

But cameras there are options that are not cloud based. Safemo is probably the best comparable product to other WiFi cameras, and then there's any NVR system. You can accomplish the same thing without much sacrifice or compromise.

Then there's the its "fine" today but tomorrow things change... Like Ring now feeding images to Flock and their surveillance/facial recognition system.

So no, its not quite okay that "they already have my data from other places so it doesn't matter"

[–] Slysilverat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

I have plenty of things to hide BUT nobody cares about my opinion, after signing up my life to Uncle Sam.

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How did your boss respond?

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Like you would unfortunately expect. “I don’t care if they know that stuff.”

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At it's basis, 'nothing to hide' is yet another shinning example of the American propaganda machine. When it comes to propaganda, America has no equals. In a lot of 'closed' countries, their citizens are usually aware that their government is full of shit and oppressive. They just duck their heads and try not to raise suspicion. The American public eats it up and regurgitates ad nauseam.

However, when you start relating their everyday actions to privacy, anonymity, they do realize that yes, they do demand privacy in their daily lives. It's just that there is a disconnect between real life and digital life, in people's minds and it takes a total rethink for them to realize, in this time line we are in, there really isn't/shouldn't be a difference between the two.

[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Your marklar are wise.

[–] ki9@lemmy.gf4.pw 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I used to pitch signal's encryption first. I got into so many pointless arguments that I stopped even mentioning encryption. What's signal? Its an app with group chat and video calls. That's all you need to know.

Two of my friends independently discovered the secret to converting their families to signal. Make it a premium form of communication. Tell people close to you that you check your whatsapp or facebook occasionally because of the spam volume... The best way to reach me is on signal.

Had a kid this year and we don't post pix of him to social media. They all get sent to a signal group. You want the baby pix? You get signal! Even his 90-year-old great grandma is in it.

[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

It must feel good to known they aren'tnusinf your child as data collection to sellnyou ads! Keep those photos off social media!

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

"I have nothing to hide" is as only as good as what the government thinks is illegal. And that may be far from reasonable and can change very quickly, just look at US or UK.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One thing I find it odd that I don't ever see mentioned is the most obvious: private data is money and power for companies. Do you like X (meta, google, literal moronic x, etc) company that much that you want to donate money to them and make them more powerful?

Almost no one would say yes. They don't care about their privacy, but they certainly don't think poor zuckeberg needs some donations and more power.

It's by far the biggest reason I care about my data. If I liked the company I wouldn't mind the donation. But only evil companies would try to profit from personal data, so that can't exist. My hate for these companies and my wish to see them destroyed far outweighs my concern with my privacy.

That includes governments of course. The one with the most spying, like the US or israel are the ones I hate the most and try as much as I can to not give them more power.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

private data is money and power for companies

Please someone explain to me for the thousandth time how our personal data equals money because I still don't understand. My bank account has no money going to Google, meta, X...

I truly want to understand where they're getting all this money.

[–] bystander@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They are paid by advertisers that want to sell you things and ideas. Google and Meta's job is to keep you on their platform as long as possible so you can be served more advertisements. And to keep you dependent on their free platform to gather more data about what you like and your behavior patterns to easily influence and predict what advertisements grab your interest.

And because they have the data on you to know exactly who you are and what you may like, it's valuable for advertisers because they know their cat litter advertisement is going to be shown to someone who very obviously has a cat through all their activities and interactions on the platform.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be honest, since I have adblock I find it hard to understand too. How can that make so much money? But all the current richest companies and people built their empire on private data right? Google, Facebook, elon musk and so on, so it's very easy to see the proof. You give them your data, you give them money.

Now, power is easier to understand. If you want to control or kill people, the more information you have the better. It's easy to see why evil governments have always loved spying.

[–] bystander@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Evidently they are still pulling enough users and click through rates to warrant their reputation in advertising. Whether or not some numbers are propped up by bots, who's to know.

Imagine billions of people depending on their platforms, and most of them will be accessing it through their official mobile apps which generally will be harder to block ads on, and most people will not seek out those methods. It's the reason they push their official app so much. For some it is a lower priority for them, and some may even enjoy targeted advertising.

There are platforms like YouTube where you can pay to opt out of seeing ads, which is also another revenue stream.

[–] guismo@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just have no idea what the life of a Facebook user, for instance, is like. What apps do they use, do they wear Facebook glasses? Facebook buttplugs? Can they use adblock?

It's a wild, unknown world, and I hope to keep it that way. What everyone knows is that they are filthy rich and they got there with private data. And that's all everyone needs to know to decide if they want to make them richer and their data is the tool for that.

But the specifics elude me.

[–] bystander@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Nope haha, just their Facebook app on their mobile phones is needed to grab all the data. And once logged in, Facebook will actually track the user's phone usage and their Internet usage as data without the user knowing. To add to their pile to analyze the user.

This also includes Instagram and Whatsapp. Meta's other products.

Not participating in any of their products so your data is not their raw resource is good, keep it that way.

[–] hiramfromthechi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Might add this to the pinned posts at the top of idcaboutprivacy... Any objections?

[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah it really breaks it down to simple rebuttals people can actually use to help get through to people.

[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

When it was Obama listening in on their phones, westeners agree.
When it was Biden or Trump listening in on their phones, westeners went quiet.
When it's Xi selling phones unbugged, westeners grab your phone throw it on the ground, pour gasoline over it, light a fire, scold you and threaten your life.

[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's been my experience throughout the years.
I haven't personally heard "I have nothing to hide"
since Huawei phones started to become banned in my country.

The moment they became popular they went from
"I've got nothing to hide" to "I've got nothing to hide, but this is different. Huawei is subject to the Chinese State.
Those other phones are made by our allies. We may have found time after time again that all phones of all our politicians have been tapped by the US and it's true that no matter how hard our best security experts searched for listening bugs in these devices, they found diddly squat, but if you own one of those Chinese phones and think you're not being listened to, than you're being naive. Naive naive, !be scared!, naive national security naive.".

[–] Dreaming_Novaling@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

They're all bad.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dad is the type to nag nag nag until we either give in or tell him off. Lecturing doesn't work in my family because of my dad. They know I'm willing to help if they want to change.

[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ki9@lemmy.gf4.pw 5 points 1 week ago
[–] abs_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

TLDR: Take off your pants then.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's see your browser history.

[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

You first you coward!

[–] viewports@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I've always reduced the argument to something like

"I have nothing to hide" ... "well, you don't get a choice"

at the end of the day removing privacy strips autonomy

[–] Catalyst_A@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

I bring up Cambridge analytica since it was well known for Brexit. I'm like "It's not about what you have to hide. Its about stopping automated unconsenting data collection that's sold to the highest bidder to effect election results that will impact generations like Brexit. That data came straight from META."

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This seems to be an advertisement for a subscription chat program.

load more comments (1 replies)