this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)

Global News

5090 readers
305 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sydney (AFP) – Australia's tropical rainforests are among the first in the world to start emitting more carbon dioxide than they absorb, scientists said Thursday, linking the "very concerning" trend to climate change.

The world's rainforests are typically thought of as crucial "carbon sinks" -- sucking huge quantities of planet-heating emissions from the atmosphere.

Some models predict that increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could boost forest growth by offering trees more of the basic fuel they need for photosynthesis.

But new research found extreme temperatures have instead caused more forest death than growth, with rainforests in Australia's northern tropics becoming net carbon emitters.

"This is the first analysis to show this pattern occurring for natural undisturbed forest and as a persistent pattern over many years," senior author of the research Patrick Meir told AFP, describing the results as "very concerning".

The researchers pored through records charting the growth of Queensland's rainforests over almost 50 years.

They found that around the year 2000 they began emitting more carbon dioxide from the decay of dead trees than was being taken in and stored by growing trunks and branches.

Modelling showed the main cause was extreme temperatures linked to climate change, and its related effects on the moisture in the atmosphere and drought. Cyclones, which are expected to increase in intensity with climate change, also had an impact.

The findings are in line with some research on the Amazon that showed growing tree deaths weakening the forest's carbon storage capacity, said David Bauman, a research scientist at the French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development and second author of the study.

"So in that sense our result is not surprising, but the timing... happened earlier than we expected and the effects of the likely climatic drivers (high temperature, drought) are stronger than we expected," he told AFP.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature, suggests other rainforests could experience the same shift, but the authors warned more data and research was needed.

"It appears that all tropical forests are likely to respond fairly similarly," said Meir, but "the exact mechanisms and timings for different regions will differ."

The findings should ring alarm bells, said Melanie Zeppel, an expert on forest carbon who was not involved in the study.

"This study shows that impacts of climate change on forest carbon are more severe than previously reported," said Zeppel, associate director at climate change investment firm Pollination.

"Immediate action on climate change must be a key priority," she told AFP.

The study's authors cautioned that some unknowns remain.

Their work focused on branches and tree trunks, but roots and soil also play a role in carbon absorption and emission which has not yet been fully quantified.

Still, the patterns observed are clear, and "indicate that the challenge to limit global warming to well below 1.5 degrees Celsius has become both more urgent and more difficult," said Bauman.

Despite its growing vulnerability to climate-linked natural disasters, Australia remains one of the world's biggest exporters of gas and thermal coal.

Australia's carbon dioxide emissions per person are among the highest in the world, World Bank figures show.

Global emissions have been rising but need to be almost halved by the end of the decade to limit warming to safer levels agreed under the 2015 Paris climate agreement.

The increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere last year was the biggest ever recorded, the United Nations said this week.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But all of our climate models were dependent on the earths natural processes doing the heavy lifting, so that we could continue doing the bare minimum unabated...

Could this mean that the "most likely" 1.5-2c trajectory determined by the best and brightest fossil fuel states is actually really a 3-4c, billions will die, scenario?

Don't worry, though. Future generations can suffer in the solace that "nobody could have predicted this".

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

Welp, I guess this means we should burn them down, that’s good grazing land.