No? It doesn't seem to be a use case they target.
If you want to use git to store sensitive data, you should encrypt it before committing / pushing it.
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
No? It doesn't seem to be a use case they target.
If you want to use git to store sensitive data, you should encrypt it before committing / pushing it.
No? It doesn’t seem to be a use case they target.
The problem is that making a repository private makes users think their data can't be seen so they may upload that kind of information.
If you want to use git to store sensitive data, you should encrypt it before committing / pushing it.
I'll look into that.
Usually you don't accidentally open a git repo and set up a ssh key and push your own credentials to a foreign repo. Usually that involes reading a manual. If those tutorial don't cover keys, then the tutorials need to be improved. imo
Generally if you want to combine full encryption with version control, your best bet would be instead to not use something like Forgejo, and instead do something like init a local git repo, commit like usual, then set up scripting that will tar.gz archive the entire repo, PGP encrypt the archive, and then upload that to a cloud provider's file storage. That way, it's got privacy (the archive is encrypted), it's got version control (once decrypted and decompressed it goes back to being a folder with a git repo in it), and it's backed up (via cloud file storage provider).
I use SOPS for this.
https://devops.datenkollektiv.de/using-sops-with-age-and-git-like-a-pro.html
Set filters in git certain files are added encrypted.
You can also do multi key set ups if you have a shared secret (like a lab space creds) or want to share some secrets with ci/cd tools
Maybe you would be interested in git-crypt: https://github.com/AGWA/git-crypt
(The source code is on Github but it's a generic Git tool)