this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2025
404 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

76046 readers
2797 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If 4chan continues to ignore Ofcom, the forum could be blocked in the UK. And 4chan could face even bigger fines totaling about $23 million or 10 percent of 4chan’s worldwide turnover, whichever is higher. 4chan also faces potential arrest and/or "imprisonment for a term of up to two years," the lawsuit said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

This censorship shit is out of control.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Will the notorious hacker known as 4chan finally get his comeuppance?

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 76 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (7 children)

British government fines an American company, based in America, for serving data from American servers that was compliant with American law.

This whole law is complete overreach. It's like banning a book and then getting mad at the author when one of your citizens buys one on holiday and brings it back with them

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

Salman Rushdie: First time?

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Pretty sure 4chan is Japanese owned now so I'm confused. I guess they still operate out of the USA. Idk. Currently owned by Hiroyuki Nishimura, who also owns 2channel. He acquired 4chan from Christopher Poole 2015. Good Smile Company is a major investor but he's still in charge.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think Iran should fine the UK just as much for allowing the Satanic verses to be sold since that novel are banned in Iran.

Any argument they give is the same argument why the 4chan shit is laughable.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You probably don't want Iran to have jurisdiction over your dot-com.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Iran

Capital punishment is a legal penalty in Iran.[2] The list of crimes punishable by death includes murder; rape; child molestation; homosexuality; drug trafficking; armed robbery; kidnapping; terrorism; burglary; incest; fornication; adultery; sodomy; sexual misconduct; prostitution;[3][4] plotting to overthrow the Islamic government; political dissidence; sabotage; arson; rebellion; apostasy; blasphemy; extortion; counterfeiting; smuggling; recidivist consumption of alcohol; producing or preparing food, drink, cosmetics, or sanitary items that lead to death when consumed or used; producing and publishing pornography; using pornographic materials to solicit sex; capital perjury; recidivist theft; certain military offences (e. g., cowardice, assisting the enemy); "waging war against God"; "spreading corruption on Earth"; espionage; and treason.[5][6] Iran carried out at least 977 executions in 2015, at least 567 executions in 2016,[7] and at least 507 executions in 2017.[8] In 2018 there were at least 249 executions, at least 273 in 2019, at least 246 in 2020, at least 290 in 2021, at least 553 in 2022, at least 834 in 2023,[9] and at least 901 executions in 2024.[10] In 2023, Iran was responsible for 74% of all recorded executions in the world, with the UN confirming that at least 40 people were executed in one week in 2024.

Frankly, 4chan users or operators would probably have violated some of those, were they under jurisdiction of Iranian law.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 27 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

4chan also faces potential arrest and/or "imprisonment for a term of up to two years," the lawsuit said.

I wanna see how a website would be sent to jail.

[–] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 26 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Clearly they're after the notorious hacker known as 4chan

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 points 7 hours ago

All 4 of them face charges.

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 hours ago

I see you never downloaded a car before.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 14 points 9 hours ago

So then.... Potential arrest and imprisonment for 4chan for no proven damage. Meanwhile, Trump can visit the King.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 11 points 9 hours ago

They have no way of making them pay.

[–] Ultraword@lemmy.ml 21 points 10 hours ago

The global push for censorship is accelerating and not nearly enough people are woke to it.

[–] Gemini24601@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

Is it even possible for Ofcom to legally fine 4chan for these issues? How does a company in the UK fine a US company?

[–] WALLACE@feddit.uk 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It works the same way they can fine domestic businesses: Pay up or we'll stop you from doing any more business in this country.

In the context of a website like 4chan that means pay the fine or get blocked by every UK based ISP.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 10 points 9 hours ago

I don't think that would deter any of their user base.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Oh no! That one country out of all the other ones will be the biggest loss ever!

Anyway, about these things called VPNs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 101 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (13 children)

This is a case of stupid laws that still don't understand the internet (35+ years in to wide use, mofos)

If an http GET request initiated from country A traverses routers and wires around the globe to grab some data from a server in country B, then we have to accept that the owners of the server are not "operating in country A" and in fact the user in country A is responsible for import.

If some laws in country A have a problem with this, then they should unplug their internet wires at the border, or at least learn how to use them and/or govern their citizens.

All that is tongue in cheek to say they can fuck right off.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 4 points 10 hours ago

Blocking america as a whole would do the uk some good tbh

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

If some laws in country A have a problem with this, then they should unplug their internet wires at the border, or at least learn how to use them and/or govern their citizens.

What used to be called The Great Firewall of China. It used to be unthinkable for western countries.

You can't blame this on old people. This is only happening now that the Boomers are on the way out. People who sent international letters or made international phone calls were aware that they were communicating with a different country with different laws. I think we are seeing this now, because now we have people who experience the internet as something happening on their own phone, at their location.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 12 hours ago (7 children)

The boomers are not on their way out. We have the exact same politicians in power that we had 30 fucking years ago.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (6 children)

Yeah it's a stupid law and they were told it wouldn't work by industry experts. But the politicians that were in power when all this was first been decided were Conservatives and therefore arrogant and of the opinion that if they don't like something, it's realities responsibility to reconfigure itself.

Then Labour got in and for some reason implemented the stupid law anyway despite having heard none of the consultations, and of course now it turns out that the consultations told them not to do it. Now I'm sure the industry experts would have been ignored anyway but Labour look really daft now.

They have basically accepted that this law is unworkable and is basically going to be ignored by everyone, but they still have to go through all of the pantomime of trying to enforce it. I'm sure eventually they'll quietly kill it because the whole thing has been such an embarrassment for them.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 hours ago

Yeah it’s a stupid law and they were told it wouldn’t work by industry experts.

You mean lobbyists?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

4chan is likely using this to take it to the courts.

[–] MeThisGuy@feddit.nl 26 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

hope they write their legal battle in green txt

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 42 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

be me

American't social mediatard

Britbongs demand money

Notmyproblem.png

[–] MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

> be me
> mfw

The defense rests.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nevemsenki@lemmy.world 101 points 18 hours ago (17 children)

If you're ok with this then imagine your local lemmy instance getting fined by China/Qatar/Thailand/etc for posting something breaking their laws.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Fine the phone company for allowing calls they don't like.

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

More likely than dining then for calls I don’t want to get they they facilitate by selling my data. Linda of like the scale car warrantee mail you get because the DMV sold your data.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›