this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
1023 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

11935 readers
3785 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Windows 8 was actually great after the initial issues at launch.

[–] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

8.1 addressed my issues.

Eh, I’d consider sliding the window a little differently. Command prompt only OS’s like DOS or maybe even BASIC as the “rock.” Windows was more like a Model T car. Make W11 a Pinto or something.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 121 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They know we liked Win7. They'll never go back, they'll just keep making it worse for us and more profitable for them.

That's why I switched to Linux Mint a year ago. I feel sorry for people who can't switch for whatever reason.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

I did a switch last week and i feel like my life became just a little bit more bearable because THERE IS NO FUCKING BLOAT. Win11 actively makes you feel bad using a computer.

[–] PacMan@sh.itjust.works 90 points 1 week ago (3 children)

95 is the stick, ME is the stick up someone’s butt

[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

2k is what xp as shown as, xp was nt but prettier.

[–] gnu@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, 2k should be the normal hammer and XP should be a hammer with rounded edges and a gradient.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

NT is stuck

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] loweffortname@lemmy.blahaj.zone 76 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Windows 95, ME, NT, and 2000 erasure.

And 3.11 for Workgroups.

[–] chocosoldier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 week ago

nobody talks about 2000 bc 2000 was solid as fuck and there was nothing to complain about

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

It's really incredible how Microsoft is trying to drive people away, by:

  • Polluting what works.

  • Never actually finishing revamps in progress.

  • Pushing so much crap even normal users are conditioned to click Microsoft 'features' away as spam.

They don't have to do anything! They could just freeze Windows 11 and gut development beyond security/api/hardware fixes, and rake in business "stuck on win32" dollars for eternity. But no, they are trying their absolute best to push folks to Android/iOS and open a window for stuff like the steam deck.

I bet we aren't far from OEMs even getting sick of it, as shipping (admittedly, trashy self made) linux distros.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

In Late Stage Capitalism, companies have realized they can maximize their profits by making their product worse. Especially when they have a (near) monopoly.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I remember when we were a Unix shop (BSD & Linux) sharing space with guys writing code for some kind of printing software (for professional printing shops that did complex format conversions) that apparently absolutely had to be on Windows (because, unclear reasons, nobody would buy a non Windows printing management box, or something).

Anyway, they were writing for one of the early versions of NT, maybe 2000, not sure, and were pulling their hairs out the whole time we were with them.

A classic I remember was "the system will just decide that our driver (pretty much the only thing running) isn't that important, and dump it's priority to the shitter. Once it's there, it's dead in the water and we can't get it active again without physical intervention. We've been talking to Microsoft for weeks to get around this."

I suppose this has been more or less addressed by Microsoft nowadays, but, of course, this kind of thing hasn't been an issue in unixland, like ever. Because it's a system that fucking makes sense. And about the versions of Windows, I stopped using their stuff in the DOS days, so it's not like I even have an opinion.

(and yes, they did have a couple very high end developers, on top of the regular grunts)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mostly_Roblox@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Windows peaked at 7, I only moved to Windows 10 when Windows 7 lost support

[–] cm0002@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Oh how I wish we could just go back to W7 :(

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 days ago

I've got Windows installed on a separate drive in case I wanna play Forza Horizon 5 (which I stupidly bought on Microsoft store because stepdad had an Xbox at the time and it was nice to be able to play on that as well when I was visiting - now even he moved to PS5). I haven't booted it in over half a year despite missing the game at times. If it was Windows 7, I'd probably boot every now and then.

At this point I've forgotten if I have Windows 10 or 11. Chances are I did some enterprise version of one of them to get longer support, as I did the OS install like 8 or 9 months ago.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I agree. This is why I think literally all software should be FLOSS. People should be able to use a platform as long as they like on their own hardware.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] BootLoop@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

But Windows ~~10~~ 11 is going to be the last version of Windows!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago

There were four versions that were useful for their time. Accurate.

[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Win ME is the 98 image but the rock is on the smaller branch

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 11 points 1 week ago

This is why I am on linux.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Or my personal favorite, Win2K?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It's a stone hammer, but fully locked in place and chipped into a somewhat flat head.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

And it doesn't show on the pictures, but it was always made of rubber.

[–] Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Where the fuck is Windows 2000 Advanced Server? The shiniest turd of them all

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] myotheraccount@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Windows 9 looks nice, I'll take that one

[–] mrmorganiser@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What about Windows ME? - the best version of classic windows.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Windows ME was one of those squeaky toy hammers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halloween_spookster@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's just a bottle of whiskey

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

"Peak" performance

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why skip 95 and put a blank in for 9. Windows 95/98 are the reason why there is no windows 9. Far too many lazy programmers make software and drivers that abbreviated to windows9 because there were two versions. Still nice try, I guess.

[–] TipsyMcGee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the omission is notable and funny, even if they had their reasons

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›