this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
1023 points (98.8% liked)

Funny

11919 readers
3555 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I thought 10 was a decent OS once debloated, used it for a while.

Back to Linux now though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mostly_Roblox@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Windows peaked at 7, I only moved to Windows 10 when Windows 7 lost support

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago (4 children)

That's mostly due to your age. Older people say it peaked at XP, younger people are saying it peaked at 10. Truth is, they're all kinda the same shit.

[–] Logical@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Is it though? From a privacy perspective I think Windows 10 quite clearly started introducing some shady surveillance practices which were absent in earlier versions. Of course, 11 took that waaay further, but 10 was a turning point imo.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think it's a hard case to make that 7 wasn't objectively better than XP.

Windows 10 did roll back some of the more egregious stuff from Windows 8, but still was sort of committed, sort of not. You had a platform with multiple personalities, multiple right click context menus, multiple 'control panel' with a new one being emphasized, but not actually completed, so it's an awkward mix of the platform they had suceeded with and a platform they wished it could be (combined with telemetry). Forced microsoft accounts and using the desktop as a platform to promote products and services....

Yeah I think a fair argument can be made that WIndows 7 was the ultimate execution of the general vision that started with Windows NT, and what came after was something else that also happened to have bits of that original product hanging on.

I'm not too terribly excited by any Windows in particular, but I can recognize something categorically different they wanted to do starting with 8 that remains partially executed to this day, starts to emphasize Microsoft's interests at the expense of the users, and a direction that no one really asked for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

95, 98, xp, and 7 were all great; each improved on the last. But 7 was the true peak. 10 was pretty good and unfortunately was the turning point into enshitification.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Do not make me find the pic of The Dude.

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I might be slowly turning into Jeff Bridges.

Edit: missed the joke. My opinions about windows are grounded in my own experience, obviously. I'm the 'wait for the first SP' person historically. 10 was the first time I was not excited to install a new operating system. Everything was behind shitty UI that took away simple functionality. Funny enough I'd go back to it over 11 lol.

load more comments (1 replies)

Nah. XP was huge when it came out because NT was so much smoother and more stable than the Windows 9x product line: it was nearly as stable as 2000 with a more modern DE than Windows 95-ME.

But Windows 7 did everything XP did bigger and better. It’s no shocker that all the Windows-like Linux DEs look like forks of Widows 7.

[–] cm0002@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Oh how I wish we could just go back to W7 :(

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As a programmer, my world changed when Windows 95 came out, what with being 32-bit and having an extremely powerful (if difficult-to-use at first) low-level audio API, since I mainly wrote software synthesis and music composition apps. I have not given two fucks for anything that has happened since 95. Quite amazingly, that audio API has remained in existence, unchanged, all the way until today. 30 years of not having to change what I'm doing at all has been absolutely amazing. That shit even worked, without modification, for Windows CE (Compact Edition) and Windows Mobile, so I was able to make versions of my software synthesizer that ran on shitty smartphones from 2005. It worked on Windows Phone as well, albeit it quite uselessly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Windows peaked at DOS. It was small, inoffensive, and easily killed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elbiter@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

I miss windows millennium, which would be a hammer made of a turd.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

The plain old basic hammer probably should have been Windows 2000, and then a big playskool plastic stuff slapped on for XP, but ultimately pretty much exactly the same.

[–] mrmorganiser@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What about Windows ME? - the best version of classic windows.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Windows ME was one of those squeaky toy hammers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halloween_spookster@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's just a bottle of whiskey

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At least you can despyware 10...

[–] dajoho@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

Why should you need to? That's my beef with it. It means they don't respect you enough to give you something good in the first place and hope 99% won't bother.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

You forgot windows me.

I know it would throw off the whole 9 square thing but if you (or the person that created this) decide to add it then might I recommend a hammer smashing itself into pieces?

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn’t that what the entire thing is balanced precariously on top of? So it’s not absent from the meme, it’s lurking in the background, ever-present.

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Windows actually migrated to the NT kernel when XP launched - AFAIK, ME was a dead end.

[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

I'll take both of your words for it since the only I know about windows me is that it fucking crashed catastrophically all the fucking time.

[–] thaklor@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Oh shit.

I didn't even notice.

First I forgot about Dre and now I forgot about windows 95. Smh my head.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CuriousSkeptic42@lemy.lol 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I use arch BTW. But I liked XP and 7.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Windows 98 still had DOS built in right? I kind of have an itch to install it in a vm or something.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

yeah both windows 95 and 98 were just built on top of dos

[–] cm0002@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yea, I can never forget this logo

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

And Windows ME, though they made odd efforts to try to hide this shameful fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›