this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
148 points (98.7% liked)

news

24381 readers
581 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 20 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

yes this is electoralism and no it doesn't belong in the newscomm and yes I should nuke the thread but no I won't because there are some good posts here and I know we all love our posts, don't we folks.

for any other prospective posters: american primary politics and related rumors is solidly electoralism, not news.

[–] Spike@hexbear.net 10 points 15 hours ago

This site needs the ability to move threads between comms

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 10 points 13 hours ago

Who care. Fall for it again if you want

[–] pastalicious@hexbear.net 20 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I love it here on hexbear but it’s wild to me how hostile a few of us are to a large group of people getting together weekly to attempt to further the goals of socialism.

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 13 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Attempting to further Democratic Party entryism is not an attempt to further socialism and I don’t know why we have to keep re-learning this every two weeks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WildWeezing420@hexbear.net 19 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

I mean my main gripe originally was posting this in the news comm with big exclamation marks acting like this is big important news. The headline is literally just “somebody is considering primarying a Democrat!” It’s nothing. Not news even if you are pro-electoralist.

This was met with such doubling down and pushback that the clown on the succ session has to be started up

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 80 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Critical support to my electoralist comrades in their efforts to fire right wing Dems from their cushy bullshit jobs (US House of Representatives)

[–] SickSemper@hexbear.net 56 points 1 day ago (13 children)

May they eventually feel able to win elections without running as Democrats

[–] pastalicious@hexbear.net 37 points 1 day ago (41 children)

This is chapter by chapter. My local chapter voted against running candidates on the Dem ticket. And are critical of using limited DSA resources for candidates they know would ultimately be unaccountable to them once elected. I think some members of the chapter might be on here. mao-wave

load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 16 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

Ritchie Torres is just one rep and afaik not one with much power, but he’s known nationally for being an over-the-top Zionist. Defeating him might just be symbolic but I think it would a mistake to disregard symbolic victories. They absolutely matter.

It’s like with Zohran, even if he’s stymied and isn’t able to accomplish much, just someone with a class-conscious platform enjoying electoral success means something. It shows people are hungry for change and are more open to our ideas about class and society. And a symbolic win can give a good morale boost to all of us and help in all facets of the work we are trying to do.

Of course there are non-negotiables. If someone who identifies as a socialist is able to win material improvements for their constituents, that is good for us and building class consciousness. Someone who identifies as a Socialist makes some pro-Zionist comments? That is bad for us (and evil ofc) and there absolutely needs to be consequences. I just cannot vibe with the stark black and white thinking around electoralism that some of you have.

There is so much work to be done here in order to build the class consciousness necessary to be the foundation of revolution. Avoiding the political sphere (or any sphere) is intentionally ceding ground to our class enemies.

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 2 points 2 hours ago

I just cannot vibe with the stark black and white thinking around electoralism that some of you have.

I don't have a problem with electoralism, I have a problem with self-described "socialists" who make the decision to run as candidates for non-socialist parties. There are actually socialist parties they could run for, there is no excuse for this shit.

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The same Zohran who just pledged to slash the department of education in favor of the NYPD. Yeah good ok

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

source? i find this hard to believe

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I’m going off of a thread I read here yesterday about how he intends to maintain current NYPD numbers and to conduct a thorough line by line audit of the department of education budget to find waste to cut.

Caused a bit of a struggle session.

[–] blunder@hexbear.net 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Never thought I'd be not online enough

Can't find the thread you're talking about or any major news stories other than this:

https://abc7ny.com/post/nyc-mayoral-race-zohran-mamdani-proposes-cut-gifted-talented-program-andrew-cuomo-curtis-sliwa-want-expand/17925599/

unless you have some kind of stronger backing..? "pledged to slash the department of education" sounds pretty fanciful

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 1 points 4 hours ago

No this wasn’t it and when I tried a cursory google search I got the same thing. Sorry I don’t have a source for you but the thrust of it was Mamdani did an interview and said the NYPD would be fully funded and the DoEd would be thoroughly audited for waste. The argument here was whether or not that meant cuts and I think it’s pretty clear it does.

I should have saved the link but the latest bernard acting like the latest bernard is very unremarkable at least to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›