this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2025
179 points (97.9% liked)

World News

50070 readers
2024 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Russia fired more than 600 drones and missiles at targets across Ukraine in the early hours of Sunday morning - one of the largest barrages of the war.

At least four people were killed in Kyiv during the overnight attacks, according to Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelensky. Local officials said 42 people were injured in the capital and surrounding region, and 31 in Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine. Drones were still being shot down over the Ukrainian capital on Sunday morning.

The barrage was the third largest reported by the Ukrainian air force since the beginning of the full-scale Russian invasion in February 2022, underlining Kyiv’s challenge even after this week getting stronger signs of support from the US.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 6 points 12 hours ago

one of the largest aerial assaults of the war

only killed 4 people

how is russia this bad at war?

[–] itztalal@lemmings.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Should probably mention they were civilians in the headline.

Makes it seem like these were just normal combatants otherwise.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ukraine are doing so well when you consider Russia has thrown so much at them in one go that you can say it’s one of the largest aerial assaults of the war, and it only kills around 4 people and injures dozens.

That’s a massive waste of resources for so little gain. If that was 2 years ago the outcome would likely be very different.

A sign hopefully that the tide has turned. Fuck Russia.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Kinda freaking me out. There were WWII battles, and about any other war you care to name, where thousands were killed on the winning side and it was considered a victory, and not phyrric victory.

You got me thinking! If that's the best they can do, well, they seem to be fucked.

I wish NATO\Europe had stepped up to bat and wiped Russia's war machine off the map two years ago. Fuck is wrong with them? Just going to sit back, let the Russians take lessons on modern warfare and rearm? They're coming for you next. Head. Out of ass. Yesterday.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think they’re trying to stretch their economy and man power as much as possible.

Also their hands are tied. The good guys don’t strike first….usually. I think that’s why Russia is antagonising them all at the moment trying to get them to strike back and justify everything.

But they can’t sustain a war economy without results especially when they’re suffering the effects (gas for the people) without being invaded. I think Putin wants to be invaded so he can get conscription and popular support (everyone defends their homeland) like Ukraine does.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

without being invaded

Kursk region says hiii. There, Russia got conflicted because they both wanted to agitate people over it, but also wanted to downplay it for less reputational losses - and not get their ongoing offensive elsewhere compromised. That's where unprecedented North Korean participation occured. Not only it was on the table, it was prefered over full commitment, with all new problems it means. Why that's the case is an open question, my guess even if someone wants that, already weakened economy won't survive the amount of wear supporting more soldiers means. And, besides, the current slow grind won't be an option after that commitment - they either start winning, and fast, or it would be perceived as a total failure - and something tells me they know adding more unenthusiastic bodies won't help that much on the battlefield where what they need is not as much as manpower, but ammunition, drones, vehicles for troops already deployed. Rounds of donations and volunteering exist on both sides, and without succesful militarization of economy it's hard to imagine. What they do now is slow compensation of falling buying ability of the rouble - just today there were news of signing an order of autumn recruitment campaign (18-30, supposedly not on the frontlines) - and a 20 -> 22% rise in taxes applied to personal wages for legally employed individuals. I'd probably wait to see some more active preparations if they have planned some drastic expansion of armed troops. This can't be done overnight.