this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2025
116 points (99.2% liked)

News

32456 readers
3427 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump on Thursday announced a new round of punishing tariffs, saying the United States will impose a 100% tariff on imported branded drugs, 25% tariff on imports of all heavy-duty trucks and 50% tariffs on kitchen cabinets.

Trump also said he would start charging a 30% tariff on upholstered furniture next week.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Didn't the courts just rule this asshole had no power to establish tariffs?

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago

Bro, the king is immune to the law. Who cares what the courts say? Literally. Lmao.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Well see you have to remember this is a matter of national security. It is an emergency of such immediate necessity he couldn't ask Congress which both parts of are majority Republican, to just write it into law so it were done properly.

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Was that settled or is it in challenge status? I've seen no rebate of tarriffs going to the rich people that didn't pay them yet.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

will impose a 100% tariff on imported branded drugs,

Finally! Haven’t we been saying for years now that prescriptions are too cheap, and we really should be paying a lot more?

/s

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Wonder if we'll see more or less Ozempic ads now.

[–] Jonnyprophet@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

It's like you can hear D.T. hanging with his rich buddies...

"You know, Im thinking of getting into the kitchen cabinet making business, but I don't think I'll be able to turn a profit with all the competition."

"Here, hold the bong and let me make some calls."

[–] chaosCruiser 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Future economists are going to love this time period. It's basically a goldmine for papers, articles and books about the effects tariffs have. Sure, we have that sort of history already, but this time it's very well documented. Current online economy has so many new numbers you can track. You should be able to look at the data and tell exactly what went wrong and how it was reflected on everything.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Separating the various fuck ups and disasters will be the hardest part.

[–] chaosCruiser 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Economics is a messy science where you’re constantly dealing with messy data. There are always several variables at play, and their countless interactions make interpretations super tricky. You can’t really make controlled double blind experiments to isolate the effect of a specific variable.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Science, you say... Fortune telling, perhaps?

[–] chaosCruiser 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It’s still in its infancy. Give it a few centuries. Back in the 1400s physics was still full of opinions rather than theories backed up by empirical experiments. Economics hasn’t even figured out what the elementary particles or fundamental forces really are or how to measure them. That’s why all the models are pretty vague and qualitative at the moment.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago

Oh yes this is just extra messy. Like the federal reserve being robbed by several loosely cooperating gangs with differing goals.... During a riot caused by yet another group of gangs some of whom overlap.

A forensic nightmare within a clusterfuck.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's sort of like when we want to know something, but all experiments to find out would be highly unethical. So we wait for a madman or authoritarian regime to torture someone to find out the limits of human capability. Just with the economy instead.

Basically, in 2025 we are running a simulation to find out how much stress an economy can take before it collapses, and the goal is to actually get there.

[–] chaosCruiser 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Same goes for chemical safety. How do we know what the effects of mercury, lead, ammonia or sulfur dioxide are on humans? Tragic things have happened in the past, and the survivors just documented the results.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but you can’t Gauge everything that way…

Or bleach… we should have great information on the maximum amount of ordinary household bleach that a human being can drink at this point.

To google scholar mobile chum!

[–] chaosCruiser 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With observational incident reports you can only get a list of symptoms and a very rough range of exposure. If you want something more detailed than that, you need a proper LD50 study.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That’s fair. Not being an actual sciencer, approximately how many anit-vaxers would I need to deliver? Like you can probably round to the nearest truckload or something like that.

I think I’m gonna go somewhere and find a new edge to lord over. Maybe even touch some grass… This is getting far too close to history :-(

[–] chaosCruiser 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

A good rule of thumb in statistics is that a sample size of about 30 will give you some idea of the standard deviation. Anything less than that, and your analysis is on shaky ground. In logistics terms, all you need to get started is just one truck load of anti-vaxxers.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Radiation is another great example of this

[–] chaosCruiser 2 points 1 day ago

That is true. The demon core comes to mind as an extreme example. Also, Hisashi Ouchi paid a horrendous price in 1999.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait! He's putting a tariff on upholstered furniture? Has anyone told the vice president, yet?

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

JD is going to be slumming it at Rooms 2 Go

Probably not

[–] DougHolland@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whee, another round of tariff roulette!

Even a pinko like me understands that everchanging random rules ain't good for business.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

1000% terrifs on Lemmy comments federated from other countries, because DougHolland made fun of me, Mr trump

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, but if you sell all those businesses before they find out that they’re in trouble then it’s good for you? I don’t know much about business, but I’m fairly sure this is the way it works.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Ugghhhh. I guess I don’t wait on the Ikea cabinets I had budgeted for December then?

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are there a lot of heavy trucks imported in the US? All I see from afar are those ancient looking Kenworths, Peterbuilts and the like.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Western Star

[–] M4t1cc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Freightliner, owned by Daimler AG holds almost a 40% market share. Volvo, while not as strong, is around 10%.

Majority of the US made truck brands have an exorbitantly high maintenance cost when compared to imported trucks.