this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
111 points (80.7% liked)

Showerthoughts

37473 readers
549 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itztalal@lemmings.world 0 points 12 hours ago

I definitely think electromagnetism is magical from our perspective.

Everything else is pretty crude and we have to start looking inward for anything resembling magic.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I argue that magic doesn't exist by definition. If it actually, provably, exists we define it as not magical. Why isn't magnetism considered magic? Because it exists and can be studied.

[–] TabbsTheBat@pawb.social 44 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I saw something once along the lines of "if there was a novel where they harnessed a magical force that was thought to come from the sky, and it was used for everything, like powering devices that keep food fresh, and long distance communication, and said the majority of people had no idea of how it worked we'd call it lazy writing, but that's just a description of electricity" paraphrased a bit, but ye :3

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Plus we can imbue crystals with thought and knowledge by inscribing them with complex runes and commanding them in a special language.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Main difference is that, in fiction, the "imbuing" doesn't require a billion-dollar fab.

I mean, there are a few intrepid techno-wizards trying to do it themselves, but it's a far cry from what Big Magic can manage.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but that bullion dollar industry only grew over time. The first crystals were made in small labs pushing the edge of magic. If you let a magical world develop industrialization long enough, surely they will try to optimize their magic as far as possible as well

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

That's how you tear down the fabric of space and demons ruins the world though.

looks at climate change

Oh...

We used lightning to trick rocks into thinking.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Teaching sand to think was a mistake.

[–] Bgugi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

And yet you used sand to transmute this missive into the aether. Curious!

[–] Deebster@infosec.pub 4 points 6 days ago

I saw one comment and was sure it'd be the Arthur C. Clarke quote. I like your one, I hadn't seen it before.

[–] Bags@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Give the book Ra by Qntm a read
The synopsis is strikingly similar... It's not lazy writing, I really enjoyed that book.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Software is the closest thing we have to magic spells. You need to know the correct "activation words" and make sure they follow the correct order. If that aligns, your magic spell works; suddenly there's something on the screen that just wasn't there before. Congratulations, you completed your first summoning.

[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And the magic words are powered by magic stones that we write certain sigils in it to make it think.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Don't forget to hit the sigils with lightning

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Me when I draw ritual sigils in silicon to summon demons that mimic the speech of humans to decieve us (I asked ChatGPT to explain special relativity)

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I cast Alexa Play Back To The Jungle By Michael Guy Bowman

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Techno-mages enter the chat

[–] MarriedCavelady50@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

lol no. Software is just a written form of logic.

Writing incomprehensible hexes onto stone wafers then harnessing lightning to make them think is where it is at.

[–] littleomid@feddit.org 1 points 6 days ago

Have you read SICP?

[–] KingArnulf@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As Arthur C. Clarke said, "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

[–] nailingjello@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

Came here expecting someone to have posted this quote, was not disappointed.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

I think the MCU of all places summed this up perfectly and I think it was in Thor: The Dark World where Jane has fuck knows what and they operate on her in Asgard and she's giving medical terms and they're like "WTF just hook her up to the whoziwhatzhit and she'll be fine."

[–] remon@ani.social 10 points 6 days ago (13 children)

Magic, by definition, is supernatural. If you know how it works it's not supernatural ... thus not magic.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Show a sentinelese person a smartphone, they're gonna say it's magic.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

I like the idea that there is a God, hes just the programmer of our simulation. Magic was real, in the form of exploitable glitches, and got patched out as time went on.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What if magic was real, but required speaking actual magic words and we just haven't figured out the right words?

[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Psychopaths have figured out how to manipulate, or cast a charm spell on people. That’s pretty magical to me. Those are still words, so I’m going to count them as magic words.

Not really a Hollywood style incantation, but results speak for themselves.

[–] mang0@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

What if humans are actually remotely controlled by small alien ants?

[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I vaguely remember a quote about magic that can apply to anything. Someone taking something ordinary, and doing something extra ordinary with it.

A deck of cards isn't magic, but what the person DOES with it can be magical. Same with amusician and a musical instrument , or a writer with a pen and paper.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

Fire, electricty, gravity and magnetism is magic, and you cant convince me otherwise.

[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Technology deals with mostly physical things, magic is mostly non physical. This isn't some official definition just a better one. Real magic doesn't deal with matter or energy in the ways most people are familiar with it.

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think it's magic how the sum time sunk into a thing can be greater than the time it took to make the thing.

It's magic when 20 hours goes into a painting and it generates (5 minutes * 300) worth of emotions.

It took Tolkein more energy / emotion to make LotR than I'm willing to give appreciating it. But everyone combined has certainly outweighed what Tolkein put in. It's magic to me to think of "free" "emotion hours".

Everything else is so... crass. Transactional. A battery that holds X energy means the sum energy people can extract would be X at best. I have 7 hotdogs and so at most 7 people can each have one.

But art? Games? Puzzles? It's magic how there's basically infinite energy inside.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I think it’s magic how the sum time sunk into a thing can be greater than the time it took to make the thing.

It’s magic when 20 hours goes into a painting and it generates (5 minutes * 300) worth of emotions.

This is why I like music. I'm not spending 100 hours to make something someone will look at for 10 seconds.

I played this guitar part for 5 mins? You listen to it for 5 mins. (creation time may be multiplied by fuckups and overdubs/additional tracks)

[–] DreamAccountant@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Magic was never real. It was technology all along.

People were incredibly stupid when the churches didn't allow education for the masses.

A Yo-Yo would have made you a magician. It's not a magical feeling to be worshipped by idiots for knowing how a Yo-Yo works. It's just sad.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I kindof agree but I'd phrase it the other way round: people always tended to call things they don't understand Magic.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The inverse of Clark's saying: sufficiently explained magic is indistinguishable from science (credit: Girl Genius webcomic)

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

sucky magic. Well until we have transporters and replicators.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Belief in magic is kind of hard to define, anthropologically—we tend to call anything that contradicts currently-known laws of physics “magic”, but that makes the term contingent on the observer’s knowledge rather than the believer’s. (For instance, things like astrology and alchemy that we regard as magic now were thought to be the result of natural forces in the Middle Ages.) But there are other things the believers themselves agree are “magic”, even if they think they can explain it.

For myself, I would call magic the belief that there are multiple, independent systems of causality, whether the believer fully understands those systems or not—and by that definition, technology isn’t magic for most people.

load more comments
view more: next ›