this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
132 points (98.5% liked)

PC Gaming

12315 readers
429 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 15 hours ago

Leave it to Valve to find the most predatory monetization possible.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 34 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

Who is buying these skins. I feel like such an alien sometimes. I just can't understand wanting to spend any money at all on a cosmetic skin

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Before this shit existed (like back when the hottest shit was Quake), I thought it might be cool to get a professionally made skin everyone in the game could see for like $0.25-$0.50. A dollar, at most.

The first iteration of a system that could have potentially made that a reality, the things you'd actually wanna buy were $25-50. Like who the fuck workshopped these ridiculous prices?

[–] Michal@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

Adjusted for inflation, the price is probably the same 😅

But seriously they just charge whatever people will pay. It's not like it's free market, if people can't make their own custom skins.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I wouldn’t spend money on skins in most games but Counter Strike is different. You can buy a skin, use it for years, and then sell it for more than you paid. In fact, skins are actually a very good investment that have historically had less volatility and better returns than stock indexes like the S&P 500.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago

But you can't get your money back out. You only get Steam wallet credit when you sell it, right?

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

These skins have 15% returns? That seems dubious but it could be. I don't think you can sink $300k into skins like you can vanguard, though.

[–] Noobnarski@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I bought operation cases for around 100€ 5 years ago, it's now worth 1000€

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think you can sink $300k into skins like you can vanguard, though.

There are skins worth millions, so definitely you can.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

...who is paying a million dollars for a skin??

[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago

That's the case with a lot of collectibles. LEGO is a great investment but you have to keep it somewhere

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Agreed. The only time I'll buy a skin is if it literally improves camouflage. I see no reason to buy a flashy skin that only serves to make you more visible to enemies.

[–] cRazi_man@europe.pub 59 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Don't hate me for asking a question. I don't endorse loot boxes and do think they suck. But help me understand:

Isn't this better than loot boxes?

You get to see what you're paying for before you pay. You pay more for rarer items that clearly have very high monetary value and you're allowed to sell on items for real money of you want.

Valve also still sticks with a cosmetics only model and no gameplay affecting transactions. Selling cosmetics only is probably the best way to monetise.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 19 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

and you're allowed to sell on items for real money of you want.

Just to be real: You can sell them for Steam Wallet funds, which is not "real money" since it can only be used on Steam.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You can sell them on hundreds of third-party marketplaces that let you withdraw to your bank account or crypto wallet.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You can do that, but you're not allowed to do that.

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Valve may not endorse it, but they certainly allow it. In fact, there are many skins that cannot be traded on Steam’s official marketplace, but only on third-party sites due to their high value.

[–] Luffy879@lemmy.ml 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

You get to see what you're paying for before you pay.

Yes, for the first box. The box after is not shown. So its basically just „hey, if I open this Box, it could very well be that the next box will be a legendary knife”

So you are just betting for what comes after that

[–] AAA@feddit.org 3 points 14 hours ago

Still the point is you don't spend money without knowing what you get so it is better. Still predatory, but better

[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

The new case doesn't have legendaries.

[–] Malix@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

I don't play CS, but...

I dunno, bit better, bit worse, little bit of column a and b. To me this reads like "surprise-fomo-store": congratulations, you found the rarest of things, good job, now fork over this months rent money, you'll probably never get this lucky again!

Sure, you don't need to pay, but same argument applies to lootboxes in general.

The prices of these rarer items are just silly. TBH.

[–] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Previously, loot box's gain is a probability distribution over (market price - fixed box price). Now it's (market price - rarity price according to Valve).

I think in the end the market will take the Valve price (fixed or with rarity) into account since it's known and the same to everyone. Then it's again just playing against the probability distribution of items.

[–] ThunderComplex@lemmy.today 18 points 20 hours ago

Oh so it’s loot boxes mixed with a limited time store multiplied by FOMO. Very cool.

Not!

Also: “At what point do they become macro transactions?” IMO at $2. That’s the micro/macro cutoff for me.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 77 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Predatory as hell. Almost impressive how Valve manages to simultaneously be one of the best and one of the worst companies in gaming.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

Best or worst, aim for No. 1!

[–] Faydaikin@beehaw.org 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just goes to show the dire state the rest of the industry is in.

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 22 hours ago

They shot themselves in the foot in my opinion. I just won’t play video games that have that gambling aspect to them. I already spend enough on trading cards for that thrill

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 8 points 1 day ago

“Best of the worst”.

[–] redditexcommunicado@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Best of both Worsts.

[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

I think being able to see the item and having the option to purchase is much better than opening a random box that you have no idea what you'll get.

[–] itsathursday@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Stop paying for stupid shit in games or just stop playing these games. Donate to charity instead.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

I would never pay for a cosmetic or loot box. but if that's the story of thing someone wants to do, I think this new system is fine

[–] 0li0li@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Urg, AAA games suck ass more than ever. Thank christ for offline, AA and indie games!

[–] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 6 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I’ve been saying for years that valve is an extremely predatory and scummy company but don’t let the gamers hear that. Queue downvotes

[–] KAtieTot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 23 hours ago

The fact that the skins don't affect gameplay is really nice, but you can't ignore that the lootbox system is just a slot machine and that they allow skins to be gambled on the web.

Also their moderation is fucking awful

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, this is just cosmetic stuff and you can see what you're getting before you buy, plus you can sell the stuff for real world money. This is the least scummy way to do it.

[–] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

It’s just cosmetics is the excuse companies have given since the very first days of horse armor and look at where we are now…

[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Wow look at this bait! So fresh!

[–] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not bait. I’m just morally opposed to the normalization and encouragement of gambling especially for underaged populations but really for anyone.

[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bathing_in_bismuth@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Its a parenting skill issue.

[–] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Addiction is a disease. No amount of parenting can prevent it. You know what could? Regulating corporations :)

[–] RicoRodriguez42@lemmy.world -4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Exactly! They should start by banning porn games. Then lgbtq games that corrupts our children. Then any political opposition. Only then will we live in a free and safe society. /s

[–] GraveyardOrbit@lemmy.zip 5 points 22 hours ago

Porn and lgbtq games are not the same as gambling. You’ve used a false equivalency fallacy

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

This is pretty disgusting. Just make a normal skin store where people can buy the skins they want at whatever price you(valve) decide they are valued at. No fomo. No gambling.

[–] joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't that what they did? Except to help preserve the "value" if the rare items you still have to get lucky to be allowed to buy them.

If they had a store where you could buy the ultra rare skins for 1000$, that would push down the "value" if the skins more quickly.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 1 points 3 hours ago

The way they are preserving the value is a form of fomo.