this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
158 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

75238 readers
3102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] the_trash_man@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Don't worry about 4chan and other anonymous imageboards

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 64 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's the online forums and gaming communities that radicalized me and not the legion of drooling idiots destroying my country at the direction (or at least to the delight) of foreign adversaries. Good job, detective.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Elon sieg heilling twice and then signal boosting facists and illegally cutting democratically approved and institutionally valid spending, that hasn't radicalized anyone.

Totally normal behavior.

It's gotta be the video games and the dark web. What's dark web? It is any web space I don't know about. Duh.

I am not a fan of a few billionaires locking up every freedom we used to have so they can keep trucking toward the world's first trillionaire.

[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 67 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Shouldn't they include Truth social on there?

[–] n0respect@lemmy.world 22 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

~~Oracle~~ TikTok isn't on there either.

Oh, that's because they already have a government overseer. And owned by a Party loyalist.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 28 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

how could you be radicalized with the truth?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

There is no Radical honesty on Truth social.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Truth and "Truth social" are different things.

Truth is good.

Truth social is an orwellian social network that is at war with the truth.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 39 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Besides stating the obvious, in that this government is corrupt, and that the killer was a right-wing nut, there is one thing a ton of these people don't understand.

Most people aren't celebrating the killing of Kirk. Most people are celebrating that his incredibly provocative narrative, that violently rallied the fascists together, won't be spread at the source anymore

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Do I want people to die? Nope. Live forever, or of old age or whatever. Do I want people to stop belittling others and spreading hatred and lies and for them to cease it forever? Yes. Do I wish that Kirk saw the light or the end of a gravy train and apologized publicly and disavowed all his bs? I wanted this more than anything. I would also love to see the other propagandists and conspiracists maybe think hard about consequences of their actions and cease their lies, but I live in the real world, unlike them.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.world 21 points 14 hours ago

Not supporting the killing of Kirk, supporting the death of Kirk. It's a small but important difference.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

Most people aren’t celebrating the killing of Kirk

I've never wished a man dead, but I have read some obituaries with great pleasure

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 7 points 13 hours ago

Most people are simply mentioning how much of a piece of shit he was, and happy that he won't be spewing his nonsense anymore

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 25 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I hope they all say the same thing:

Shit rolls down hill. You're the hill DC. Fox news and the media are the hill. We're the ditch where the people congregate in and drown in your shit.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 11 points 15 hours ago

Fart Huffman will be too busy boot licking to do that.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Okay, but what if we just repeal or ignore that rule in order to conduct a pogrom of WrongThinkers?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It shuts down Truth social and all social networks. YouTube stops allowing uploads, the fediverse closes up shop, cats and dogs living together.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't shut the Fediverse; it just means each user needs to run their own instance so that the "user" doing the speech and the "publisher" liable for it are one in the same.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Ah, good point. I guess things would rapidly re-form in the favor of the fediverse if this law was overturned…

Sounds like a monkey paw situation to me!

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Well, it’ll be a difficult transition. But in the long run, maybe not?

As long as the Fourth Estate gets their shit together.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I would not hold my breath

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Like everything else, the same laws and rules they have hidden behind to justify and protect their absolute dogshit behavior will be the first things the regime will get rid of for protecting anyone other than their in-group.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Right wing extremism and radicalization?

Nooo problem

A right wing radicalizer gets shot?

We need to investigate radicalization of the online left!

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

Right wing influencers and pundits are calling for war and killings as we speak.

We'll see how they will be investigated.

[–] EndOfLine@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

No Twitter / X or Truth Social? Is this actually a "why aren't you doing more to radicalize your online forum users towards our ideology" ?

[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 15 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

As long as its on the internet, there will be strange people saying strange things.

Also good more censorship! /s

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

never mind people in the internet, maybe let’s start with the people in congress and on television. oh and, you know, the fucking president.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely zero of them should go to this.

[–] restingOface@quokk.au 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

What are the repercussions of simply ignoring an "invitation" such as this?

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's the good kind of radicalisation... /s

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 2 points 12 hours ago

Left wing radicalisation is bad.

Far right radicalisation is good.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine his surprise when all of these CEO's voice their concerns about the fascist terrorist rhetoric.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I doubt these CEOs will talk about it. Gotta stay on the good side of the Trumpy Regime.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Steve Huffman already wants to be Mini Elon Musk.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

And he and his "landed gentry" have been working round the clock to silence negative opinions about shitty people like Musk and Kirk.

[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

If they follow the script, they'll blame Antifa, Obama, and trans people.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I'm assuming it's gonna amount to "your users aren't radicalized enough"

[–] bluGill@fedia.io -2 points 14 hours ago

They need to invite lemmy somehow too. I know no ceo but still plenty of radicals. Not just on .ml though that is the worst.