this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
71 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

75169 readers
2957 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35973449

Archive article: https://archive.is/a602u

The platforms “are all facing this problem where the right wing has been on them repeatedly about content moderation and how they [shouldn’t] control any content,” said a lobbyist for Meta, who was granted anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak for the company. “And now the tables are turned in some fashion, and people are all over them, saying you can’t allow this kind of content and that kind of content.”

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn’t their entire thing that we needed free speech and shouldn’t let big tech be in charge of that?

Oh that only applies when people say things they want to hear? Got it.

[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 5 points 1 hour ago

As far as I've ever been paying attention, conservatives only argue in bad faith. It's always been about elevating their own speech and suppressing speech that counters theirs. They just couch it in terms that sound vaguely reasonable or logical in the moment if you don't know their history and don't think about it more deeply than very surface-level.

Before, platforms were suppressing their speech, so they were promoters of free speech. Now platforms are not suppressing speech counter to them, so it's all about content moderation to protect the children, or whatever. But their policies always belie their true motive: they never implement what research shows supports their claimed position of the moment. They always create policies that hurt their out-groups and may sometimes help their in-groups (helping people is optional).

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 36 minutes ago

What about 🥶 🍑

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 33 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Right wing, you can't control or censor social media.

Right wing, you need to control and censor media

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 18 points 4 hours ago

You mean Nazis, that's how the Nazis operate. Don't ever sugar coat it.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Schrodinger's internet.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 11 points 4 hours ago

Hopefully the idiots who run these tech companies will learn their lesson soon.

"If the thing is free, you're the product" applies just as much to dinners at the White House as it does to social media apps.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 24 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

These nazis are desperate to share Kirk's fate.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine what would happen if it happened again to another nazi in the near future. They would have no idea who to talk about or what to say.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

Of course they would. Hitler himself could appear and do the deed and those mouth breathers would still be like "the left did it!" Hell they'd probably think Hitler was a liberal.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 11 points 4 hours ago

Is that a surprise? Don't we know enough that when they talk about freedom of speech, they mean they should be allowed to insult and incite violence against minorities, but critics against them should not be allowed?

[–] db2@lemmy.world 37 points 6 hours ago

Fuck Charlie Kirk, I hope hell is real so he can burn in it.

[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I never knew who this prick(kirk) was until he got shot in the neck and died instantly after a disgusting defense of gun rights. I'm glad I know who he WAS now. It's soothes me when I think about his final words