this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
212 points (96.9% liked)

United Kingdom

5379 readers
599 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The restrictions also mean that disabled people can’t get a bus for free after 11 pm, because we don’t have social lives or jobs...

top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mike_Hunt@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 hours ago

i feel like banging my head against a wall, i was hoping for so much when they were voted in.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 15 hours ago

TIL that disability bus passes are time limited. Wtf?

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago

Satanic behaviour.

[–] ConstantPain@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

What a shithole country!

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It’s both despairing and frankly suspicious how suddenly Labour have shifted hard right.

They’re further right than David Cameron by now, and I’m not exaggerating.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Keir Starmer is essentially a seat warmer for Nigel Farage.

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Daily reminder Theresa May supported self ID & sensible pension reform.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Cameron's government passed same-sex marriage. Starmer's Labour are engaged in open war against trans people.

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago

Tbf that was primarily due to libdem pressure but yeah

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They are not Labour. Right now what we have are just red Tories and blue Tories.

[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

I hear someone say that China has one party with different policies while the UK has different parties with the same policies

[–] Eiren@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 day ago

I think Sturmer's party is actually further right than the Tories ever were. We have the centre-right party (Tories), the genocidal far-right party (Labour), and the maniacal Hitler worshippers (Reform).

[–] Yeahigotskills2@lemmy.ml 54 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's like their trying to please the right-wing and the reform idiots who will always hate them anyway. Totally tone deaf.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

I think they’ve had the exact same bunch of weaselly data analytics people in that the US Democrats did.

Both parties have been conned into believing the Moneyball data superintelligence that says the best chance they have of picking up votes are from “centrists” whose main priorities are hot-button culture war topics.

They’ve let themselves get dragged down into mud-wrestling with the pigs because a computer told them they should.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Labour is trying to please their rich political donors, who tend to be right wing and will always love them, so long as Labour do their donor's bidding.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 9 points 2 days ago

Welcome to politics 101!

[–] meejle@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Get back to work, Lazy Disabled People! >:(

*Off-peak times only, terms apply

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think the point is, if you're working you don't need free bus travel. If you're on the bus at that time of the morning then you're probably working (or going to an important early morning appointment, who knows), and the buses are at their busiest so discouraging extra users at that time is beneficial. This might be your only form of transport if you are disabled though, so it seems unfair to force payment if you have no other option. I get why the early peak is excluded (you could argue the afternoon peak should be excluded too), although I'm at a loss as to why it finishes at 11pm.

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 14 points 1 day ago

Really annoying that you've been downvoted for a very reasonable take.

and the buses are at their busiest so discouraging extra users at that time is beneficial.

This is the key justification. However, the issue it points to is that the government are putting the desires of a business (primarily First Group) before the needs of the population.

The goverment should make law for the benefit of the people, and businesses should work within the law in service to the people, especially people that pay them. The bus companies should run more busses at peak times to meet the added demand disabled people bring.

Bus companies get massive subsidies and the businesses are stuctured in such a way as to squirrel their profits away so they can demand more. That the government, the people supposed to represent us, are capitulating to them further is an insult at best.

[–] Redfox8@mander.xyz 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Maybe if there was a public transport system still running that was not just a cash cow and stifled for the benefit of big oil then it wouldn't matter who used it when.

Some people wake very early and may only be well enough during rush hour to travel.. and yet they're not supported in doing so, even though it'd cost relative pennies.

Oh and re your last Q, disabled people aren't allowed to go out on the lash or to the theatre etc, they're disabled so should be tucked up in bed staring at the samecwall they've been staring at all daytime. It saves the government tens of pounds a year that!

PS I'm not being narky at you, rather the system.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

Yes, buses should be for the benefit of all. Unfortunately they are mostly run by private companies who want to make a profit.

(Also I see that I got downvoted for trying to provide a balanced view of why this is even a policy, aren't the votes supposed to be "adds to the discussion" not "I agree"?)

[–] Eiren@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"I think the point is, if you’re working you don’t need free bus travel."

Because there are exactly zero people in the country who are working but also poor, of course.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a fair point, but I was looking at it from the government's angle. If you're working, you have the money to pay for the transport to get you to work. If you can't afford to eat after that, that's a different matter entirely.

[–] Eiren@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 day ago

So what you're saying is the government struggle with even elementary microeconomics?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I thought the labour party was the liberal party in England...

Oh wait, they're exactly like our liberals aren't they?

[–] Highlandcow@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

They are supposed to be centre Auth left, but they are mostly just like the torys the idea they were ever liberals is laughable

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not really they're to the right of American democrats on everything but healthcare

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago

if they stay long enough healthcare would inevitably go in that direction too. They have already signed a deal with Palantir to process NHS data.

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

They're giving the Tories a run for the prize title of Nasty Party.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] FundMECFS@anarchist.nexus 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Starmer Labour have shown themselves to have an absolute hatred for disabled people

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Wild. That’s not cool at all.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The restrictions also mean that disabled people can’t get a bus for free after 11 pm, because ~~we don’t have social lives or jobs...~~ there aren't any buses at that time of night.

FTFY.

[–] NoPanko@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are plenty of buses available after 11pm where I live

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

In cities, maybe. Everywhere else - forget it. We don't even have buses on Sundays round here. Mon-Sat you won't see one after about 7 or 8pm.

[–] NoPanko@feddit.uk 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah sure, but acting like buses after 11 is somehow irrelevant just because you don’t live in a place with them, when the majority of the population lives in big cities that DO is just ridiculous

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think they we're more going for an attack on the shit state of suburban/rural public transport than seriously suggesting that the reason for the vote was because there are no buses at that time

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, thank you.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

In cities where the majority of the people live?