chapotraphouse

I think the one from breitbart is streicher, you know, the one that looks like a bag of shit and pus (can't remember the name honestly)

My earnest belief is that progressive overload is the shortest possible distance between you and a fitter body. It's not more reps (until you stall), it's not more auxiliary lifts/machines (until you stall), and it's not cardio (also good for you). You take your 7 compound lifts (squats, deadlifts, hang cleans, OHP, bench, rows, pull ups), you hit em 3x8, and you put more weight on and continue to do 3x8. Put a couple auxiliaries on there to round out the hour, warm up, cool down, and stretch then you call it a day.

We need an edit that's a live Charlie Kirk reaction but with a smaller face

He could’ve been the JD to obama’s third run

It kinda funny bc no matter what his answer would have been it would have been aleast +2 considering he became a stat along with tha school

Anything presenting as a Marxist party but refusing to use “communist” is a potential warning sign. Think “revolutionary socialist party”, “socialist equality party”, “socialist alternative”.

If they’re Marxists but using the term “Stalinist”, that’s 99% chance trots in my experience. It’s their pejorative term for MLs or non-revisionist communists.

They will also potentially have references to 4th international, or 7th, or 25th, whatever number those silly lot are up to now, on their website or magazine or whatever. Speaking of magazines, trots LOVE making newspapers.

In my experience trots are either:

• almost exclusively based around organising on student campuses (where I assume they do well because kids are interesting in capitalist alternatives but have been propagandised against muh scary Lenin and Stalin, Trotsky is less vilified, wonder why…). These student groups will then glom on to almost any protest movement that has left wing appeal make themselves highly visible, biggest banners, trying to get to the front, etc. The leadership will be made up of academics or professional students who have been at uni for like 10+ years (or now work there in some capacity), whilst the rank and file is made up of 18-22 year old kids who they seem to burn out and drive away from the movement completely by the time they leave university.

Or,

• basically invisible groups who will show up to pickets to awkwardly hand out printed out articles they have written about how the striking workers union is inherently flawed and going to betray them, whilst being unable to really talk to the workers or look them in the eye due to social awkwardness. (Of course a lot of unions suck but this strikes me as a bizarre thing to do during a strike lol).

In my experience trots seem to dislike working with other left groups to some degree.

Trots love front organisations. For every lefty issue they will start a front that they actually control - “unionists for Palestine”, “students for the climate”, “community against fascism”, whatever, so they can more surreptitiously insert themselves into every issue.

Obviously, if they’re hosting reading groups or seminars to talk about the revolutionary thought of Trotsky, that’s a sign lol. They will obviously also endorse Marx and Lenin, but reject Stalin. In my experience they also will just blanket reject working with ML, Maoist, groups. Not sure how they get along with anarchists but in my city the anarchists do fuck all so it’s hard to know.

its usually trying to sell you a newspaper in .01 seconds

Like this shit is gonna make me a conspiracy guy. There just happened to be an old white guy, least likely demographic to get shot by cops, in the crowd with a fake gun. Cops spend hours interrogating him before letting him go. Meanwhile the actual shooter snipes Kirk from like 200 yards in the neck, killing him instantly. You couldn't write up a better false flag if you tried

"I did that 👈" —W.