this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2025
22 points (82.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

37064 readers
770 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If it was legit it would probably take off

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Big tech in 2025 makes its money from invading privacy and there's an increasing demographic of users that don't see any value in protecting their data from harvesting for some reason

You only have to look at a company like proton who provide a pretty comprehensive suite of privacy focussed software, and yet they're still very much a niche player in the wider tech industry

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Proton are slowing building up solid competition to google on emails, auth, cloud storage, documents. I feel like the main barrier preventing more widespread adoption is literally paying for the service, but I guess that's the price for privacy

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Yep that's exactly it, it's hard to convince people to pay for any service on the internet, let alone for something like privacy that many users have been conditioned to not value at all.

[–] Artisian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Let the record show, every time somebody tries it's out-competed by the

  • more responsive,
  • cleaner looking,
  • simpler,
  • easier to scale,
  • less error prone (and less annoying when it does error!),

horrible privacy stuff. The market really doesn't care; consumers will pay 3 less dollars for an insecure product. It's not even really their fault; it is extremely difficult to tell when software is actually secure. It is a pain to tell when some middle-man is actually selling your data or not, due to a carve-out in the TOS of a TOS of a TOS. Anyone upcharging for security could be scamming you, and with nontrivial probability is an NSA front.

This all applies to companies, which can afford to pay for security experts and analysts. See this very old interview with Schneier. Generic consumer never had a prayer.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 17 points 10 hours ago

Monkey Paw: Its a subscription service. $50 USD per month, if you stop paying, your device automatically upload all your data.

[–] BoloMKXXVIII@piefed.social 5 points 9 hours ago

Big tech is hooked on having two revenue streams. One from product sales, one from customer information sales. Why would they willingly give one up?

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Idk where you're at but I frequently see messages from big tech claiming they care about my privacy. They could launch a publicly accessible database that will only show you what they have on you and give you complete control on what to delete and I'd still be sceptical.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

But how would they make money if they can't sell targeted based advertising