this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
494 points (97.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

26407 readers
1934 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Did you ever saw a char and thought: "Damn, 1 byte for a single char is pretty darn inefficient"? No? Well I did. So what I decided to do instead is to pack 5 chars, convert each char to a 2 digit integer and then concat those 5 2 digit ints together into one big unsigned int and boom, I saved 5 chars using only 4 instead of 5 bytes. The reason this works is, because one unsigned int is a ten digit long number and so I can save one char using 2 digits. In theory you could save 32 different chars using this technique (the first two digits of an unsigned int are 42 and if you dont want to account for a possible 0 in the beginning you end up with 32 chars). If you would decide to use all 10 digits you could save exactly 3 chars. Why should anyone do that? Idk. Is it way to much work to be useful? Yes. Was it funny? Yes.

Anyone whos interested in the code: Heres how I did it in C: https://pastebin.com/hDeHijX6

Yes I know, the code is probably bad, but I do not care. It was just a funny useless idea I had.

(page 3) 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)

It is neither useless nor funny. It's optimization for storage capacity. If everyone in the world put in that level of effort into compression, computer storage and processing would actually be faster than the previous generation.

load more comments (5 replies)

in the same vein (storing more data in less bits) you should check out tagged pointers as well!

I don't think that's a useless implementation at all. code looks relatively clean, and it definitely has its uses in the embedded systems world.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›