this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
283 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74831 readers
3027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] axEl7fB5@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 hours ago

I've commented this multiple times but that fine is nothing for them. https://proton.me/tech-fines-tracker

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

3.5 billion.

This isn't a fine. This is just a windfall for the EU. The price of doing business.

If they really wanted to hurt Google they'd demand a percentage of their quarterly profits. Say 10%. That would really make Google nervous.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

10% of gross revenue would be better.

Profits can always be turned to "losses" with clever accounting and shell corps (see Hollywood accounting)

And net values can always be offset by deductions and other costs.

You can't fuck with gross.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 38 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

googles net profit is 115 billion/year. So while 3.5 is inconvenient, I imagine google feels that its just the cost of doing business in the EU.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 41 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Sure you can be cynical about it, but you could also read beyond the headline

Beyond the monetary fine, the European Commission is ordering Google to restructure parts of its adtech business. Specifically, Google must:

  • End self-preferencing practices — meaning it cannot give undue advantage to its own services.

  • Address conflicts of interest within its advertising supply chain.

  • Ensure fair competition by opening its ecosystem more effectively to rivals.

[–] localhorst@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh no, how will they ever be able to afford the 4 bn fine if they don't comply

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

wouldn't they need to pay until it's done? Looks like they found a way for them to pay a little bit of taxes

[–] localhorst@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

I believe it when I see it

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 4 points 15 hours ago

Yet at the same time Alphabet products are being used everywhere in often critical infrastructure.

I really wish the EU would do more about their pretty promises of strengthening their own.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's not how it works. Questions is how much more money they made by breaking this specific rules. If breaking the rules allowed to increase the profits by more then 3.5B then the fine is too small. If, for example, they made only $1B extra by breaking those rules then they effectively lost $2.5B and will stop breaking them.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

googles EMEA division is 29% of profits. So figure about 30k profits.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 15 hours ago

Yes but if they stop breaking the rules those profit will not fall to $0.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Holy crap. I thought you must have that wrong, probably meant revenue, but no, it really is Alphabet's net profit according to DDG (100 Billion in 2024 and rising).

This in itself is enough reason that this company must die. Not that the EU will ever achieve that, but this could be a step to big G losing its monopoly in Europe.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Missing one or two zeros, but could be agood start if it is actually done

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 5 points 13 hours ago

And that's a big if. All these companies just appeal and get a fraction of the original penalty. Company death penalty needs to exist along with prison time for C-suite and board. Otherwise, this is just the price of doing business.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 15 hours ago

That's unexpected. Are they realizing that rolling over for Trump doesn't lead anywhere?