The other option is to officially recognize that Germany has been attacked now.
They are too afraid to say it.
News and information from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
The other option is to officially recognize that Germany has been attacked now.
They are too afraid to say it.
Change the law, now. Shoot them down, track their operators. Try them as spies and deal with harshly.
Despite the use of jammers, the drones could not be fended off.
That's much more worrysome than the drones themselves. Ukraine has working jammers but Germany doesn't?
The article should answer why they cannot shoot down drones over their bases. There would be no threat for civilians.
Why? It tells us that these drones are able to operate autonomously (for a while). That's moderately useful to know.
Germany has to draft laws in order to defend its own airspace?
Jesus is that like something NATO did to them after ww2?
The Bundeswehr is not authorized to use force in Germany itself in peace times. That's the job of the police.
However air defence hasn't really been part of their job description, hence the need to adjust the law.
Apparently the government needs a two-thirds majority to pass this kind of law, which usually means that some part of the opposition needs to vote for a law proposed by the government. The two-thirds majority requirement might be due to WW2, but the real issue is that the then-opposition would literally rather have a foreign country continuously violate our airspace than give one crumb to the other side. I doubt the CDU (then opposition, now government leader) actually had much issue with the content of the law.
Also, for a long time this kind of thing just wasn't necessary. I doubt the sowjets were regularly flying military jets into West German airspace.
Germany has to draft laws in order to defend its own airspace?
No.
They would have to draft laws to defend when there is no attack. Or to defend while not calling the attack an attack.
"No bullshit" has been a good principle in most of the laws, up until recently...
Just use trained hawks, comes with built in plausible deniability ๐
Wasn't us, it was the hawks!