this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
116 points (99.2% liked)

World News

49621 readers
1825 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I read the article. The can but wont. They cant agree whether they are allowed to do it and if so whether it should be the military or police shooting them down. The TLDR is that they just dont really care.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 days ago

That's the beaurecratic shitshow I'd expect from Germany.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Rednecks have already proven that is hard bordering on impossible to safely shoot down a drone. Short of using drone-specific countermeasures, you might as well be using a butterfly net.

[–] Boo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

The article mentions failed jamming attempts.

I guess it is easy to jam civilian drones, but more sophisticated military ones probably have systems to navigate without a constant signal connection. i guess once in place and knowing the last heading, returning "home" should be rather easy to automate.

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

There is drone countermeasure stuff being developed and deployed, but its use has to be made legal first. The law doesn't allow the military to shoot down random things that are not an immediate threat. People love to act like this is ridiculous and a scandal, but considering that tiny drones haven't really been a problem for decades (and aren't actually that big of a deal RN), I thinks its reasonable to take a moment and develop procedures...

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apparently not well enough. There's enough videos online of people trying and failing to shoot at drones that it's a sort of well-proven fact that until a drone is VERY close, like 30-40 feet is my guess, it's out of buckshot range. The war in Ukraine has really shown what countermeasures work and what don't.

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I was thinking about 100ft before the pellets lose enough energy for the drone's fans to change trajectory up close. Would be interested to see how trap shooters with deer slugs fair.