this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
301 points (94.1% liked)

Comic Strips

19136 readers
1815 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 4 days ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pocket

In medieval Europe, early pocket-like openings called fitchets appeared in the 13th century. These vertical slits, cut into the outer tunic, allowed access to a purse or keys suspended from the girdle beneath.[3] Historian Rebecca Unsworth notes that pockets became more visible in the late 15th century,[4] and their use spread widely in the 16th century.[4]

Later, pockets were often worn like purses on a belt, concealed under a coat or jerkin to deter pickpocketing, with access through a slit in the outer garment.

By the 17th century, pockets were sewn into men's clothing, while women's remained as separate tie-on pouches hidden beneath skirts.[5][6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reticule_%28handbag%29

reticule, also known as a ridicule or indispensable, was a type of small handbag or purse, similar to a modern evening bag, used mainly from 1795 to 1820.[1]

The reticule became popular with the advent of Regency fashions in the late 18th century. Previously, women had carried personal belongings in pockets tied around the waist, but the columnar skirts and thin fabrics that had come into style made pockets essentially unusable.

[–] murvel@feddit.nu 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is like the tap water of comics, yum!!!

edit: lukewarm tap water

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Are we doing performative outrage over pockets on women's clothing again? Cool, cool.

Women wear clothing that is more form fitting, and stuff in pockets deforms the figure. That's why purses are a thing. If you are hellbent on big pockets sporting goods stores have hiking trousers with big cargo pockets.

[–] DivineDev@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago

Love the mens underwear ad in the background. Abs! Beard! Axe! AAAARRGGG!

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Is she getting mixed up with the fly? I’ve never seen a phone pocket, or any pocket, and don’t quite see the purpose

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't think they're overly common but she must be referring to men's underpants like this:

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That seam right down the middle doesn't look like it would be comfortable

[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, but that's the only way to get such hammock-like cupping around the boys. And apparently I don't notice it. I had to check and it turns out all mine have them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wolfrasin@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago

Damn the prison of gendered fashion. Get a utility belt

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If I'm in my underwear I'm not thinking of putting my phone in a pocket.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Not having underwear pockets are the only reason I'm not in underwear all the time at home.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›