this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
32 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1238 readers
57 users here now

A tech news sub for communists

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EmDash@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 1 week ago

The sanest take that I have read on AI is that it is a $20 Billion sector that is being treated like a $1 Trillion sector.

[–] Commiejones@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The funniest bit: In the best case scenario, one of the big AI investing companies makes a break through. When that happens all the others are going to get demolished. 4 or 5 of the 7 companies responsible for almost all the positive "growth" of the american economy are going to go belly up.

[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That assumes the breakthrough can't be copied by the others, which hasn't been the case yet.

[–] burlemarx@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

At some point, investors will start pulling their capital. They won't need 10 companies doing the same thing, so they will choose a few of them and crash the ones running behind.

[–] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 1 week ago

Of course not. Why would I pay for something that doesn't work? The AI companies should be paying me to use it.

[–] commiewolf@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NVIDIA is following the old adage of "During a gold rush, the one who really gets rich is the one selling the shovels"

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 week ago

That's basically been their business model. Of course once the bubble pops that's going to be a problem for them as well, especially given that China is starting to phase them out too.

[–] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 week ago

the company i work at got like $10k in credits from Anthropic... those finally ran out after about 8 months (? maybe 9?) and now we have to pay for it and I can almost guarantee management is going to start cracking down on its use