this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2025
635 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74831 readers
2662 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's called Premium Family, not Premium Household for fuck's sake.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ahh classic, punishing paying costumers while pirates don't have to deal with any of this shit. I guess the beatings will continue until profits increase!

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

punishing paying costumers

Time to dress up as a pirate I guess.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

Gotta give it to them. They are extremely innovative in coming up with ways of enshitifying stuff.

[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 246 points 4 days ago (45 children)

I have to hand it to them, they are really good at finding new, innovative ways to make the platform worse.

load more comments (45 replies)
[–] airportline@lemmy.zip 49 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Google really seems to want to disincentivize people paying for YouTube Premium rather than just downloading an ad blocker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 58 points 3 days ago (15 children)

Meanwhile on Steam my "family" consists of 3 adults with different addresses, last names, and credit cards, who have had accounts for decades and never lived at the same place.

We have full access to each other's library.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Gabe Newell is 62 years old. Gonna enjoy this gravy train while we can...

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My understanding is that gaben has already put an action plan in place for when the company moves on from his leadership.

From what I've heard of it, the people in line behind Gabe will be upholding the same values.

We should have at least another ~40 years or more of this before sometimes entitled brat inherits the company and sells it off to a foreign interest.

With all that being said: long live gaben.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

With all that being said: long live gaben.

I like Steam, I like that they aren't being dicks and treat users well.
That said: billionaires are not your friend.
There is no such thing as an ethical billionaire.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't say there was.

I just want this specific billionaire to continue to live because, unlike most billionaires, he's not making my life more difficult.

He's basically refused to let steam become enshittified. Other billionaires would have long ago succumb to the one that they serve, the almighty dollar, and done whatever they can to extract the most value from their user base. Enshittifying the platform in the process, and actively making my life worse.

So as far as I'm concerned, when it comes to billionaires, gaben is far from the worst.

I have a short list of billionaires that kinda fit into the category of: I don't mind that they exist.

There's a much longer list of billionaires that I'd like to see pushing up the daisies.

Not that I can, or would, do anything to make that happen. I just, wouldn't hate it if it happened.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Fair enough. It isn't that they're better, it's just that they're less worse.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

I would say, they're not necessarily good, just less bad.

Same idea though.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 3 days ago

I absolutely hate this stuff. My family doesn't live in the same house, but it doesn't mean we are not a family. My mother-in-law and sister-in-law just message us for the passwords when they want to stream something. None of us pay for youtube premium and it looks like I won't be.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Youtube can suck a peener. I will pirate whole channels if they keep fuckin' up.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Firefox + ublock origin still works to block all YouTube ads

Invidious is a frontend for YouTube that blocks all their trackers and ads

PeerTube is an alternative community ran platform to replace YouTube in the future

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 114 points 4 days ago (17 children)

Fuck GOOG for normalizing surveillance capitalism
Fuck YouTube in particular for making it basically impossible to usefully host an Invidious proxy any more and for their algorithmic manipulation

PeerTube is the Way

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I guess we going back to blocking ads

[–] jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

i never stopped, fuck these vultures - idc how many fake ass american dream-pilled carrots they wave in our faces. always fuck them.

[–] moonburster@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (8 children)

For those select few that have an iPhone

You have a few options:

  • be EU citizen and sideload a cracked YouTube (similar to vanced, but you need certificates on iOS which sucks)
  • pay for a dev account and sideload regardless of above
  • buy two apps: vinegar and AdGuard. AdGuard speaks for itself, vinegar is a tool that forces YouTube to use the html 5 player inside of safari and thus forcing it to your will

I know iPhones are hated here, but I saw the android will stop sideloading coming from a mile away. At least here in the eu apple can suck one and I can still sideload whatever I want

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

As someone with divorced parents this invalidates what I call a "family". Same to you... Netflix

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago

"There aren't enough seeds for these AI training data torrents we've been downloading. Anybody got any ideas?"

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 81 points 4 days ago (9 children)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Go on vacation? Believe it or not, banned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 56 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The whole internet has gone to shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I'm on my brother's premium. I told myself if my brother stopped wanting to pay for it I'd pay for it myself because I hate ads that much.

On the other hand, if Youtube itself takes it away from me I'm going to just stop watching Youtube.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Revance if you're on android man. I mean I pay for premium but I still use it to patch the app at least.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

On desktop, check out VacuumTube which is app that acts as a wrapper for YouTube Leanback (tv/console version) and has ad blocking built in.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Why pay for premium anyway? Let alone a family plan. You still get ads. They can be skipped too — SponsorBlock will do it for free. Google could use this but chooses not to.

They want YouTube to be like cable TV. You pay for it. You watch ads. You pay more for premium channels.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (27 children)

I pay for it. No ads. Background playing on mobile, and YouTube music included.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Background playing on mobile

The fact that they put this behind a paywall is enough for me to never pay them a dime.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So you're using SponsorBlock as well, or you're watching videos without sponsors.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This will be like Netflix pushing against shared accounts, sure it will work and their revenue will go up, but I will stop being a paying customer and will only watch videos from my notebook with adblocks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Good thing I am never going to go youtube premium.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›