this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
167 points (97.7% liked)

News

32008 readers
2856 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has audaciously claimed virtually unlimited power to bypass Congress and impose sweeping taxes on foreign products.

Now a federal appeals court has thrown a roadblock in his path.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled Friday that Trump went too far when he declared national emergencies to justify imposing sweeping import taxes on almost every country on earth. The ruling largely upheld a May decision by a specialized federal trade court in New York. But the 7-4 appeals court decision tossed out a part of that ruling striking down the tariffs immediately, allowing his administration time to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The ruling was a big setback for Trump, whose erratic trade policies have rocked financial markets, paralyzed businesses with uncertainty and raised fears of higher prices and slower economic growth.

Which tariffs did the court knock down?

The court’s decision centers on the tariffs Trump slapped in April on almost all U.S. trading partners and levies he imposed before that on China, Mexico and Canada.

Trump on April 2 — Liberation Day, he called it — imposed so-called reciprocal tariffs of up to 50% on countries with which the United States runs a trade deficit and 10% baseline tariffs on almost everybody else.

The president later suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries time to negotiate trade agreements with the United States — and reduce their barriers to American exports. Some of them did — including the United Kingdom, Japan and the European Union — and agreed to lopsided deals with Trump to avoid even bigger tariffs.

Those that didn’t knuckle under — or otherwise incurred Trump’s wrath — got hit harder earlier this month. Laos got rocked with a 40% tariff, for instance, and Algeria with a 30% levy. Trump also kept the baseline tariffs in place.

Claiming extraordinary power to act without congressional approval, Trump justified the taxes under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act by declaring the United States’ longstanding trade deficits “a national emergency.”

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 47 points 5 days ago

Nothing changes for now, the appeals court left the tariffs in place pending a SCOTUS appeal. This has been going on for a while and it's just another turn of the crank.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And the uncertainty in the meantime will drive away even more manufacturing and suppliers.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 26 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's even worse. Because the Orange Jackass axed the duty-free import exception on small purchases under $200, bunch of countries have just said they're gonna stop mailing shit here because they have no idea what the hell the rules are anymore.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 5 points 4 days ago

The private operators for packages still work, but then you'll often pay a lot more for shipping than the actual product. Large corpos are looking to set up warehouses with bulk import and local fulfilment centers. Small businesses are out of luck. And with the rules changing all the time nobody wants to bet on setting up local production. Christmas this year is going to be really expensive in the USA.

[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 4 days ago

Yep. Im seeing a lot of people i follow on socials getting screwed. They had packages already on the way or had just purchased something only to get an email saying 'tough luck' basically.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The supreme court reinstates them next Tuesday?

[–] null@piefed.au 12 points 4 days ago

The same thing that usually happens - they just get their stacked SCOTUS to rubber stamp them.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is there any working mechanism for collecting the tariffs yet?

[–] lemmysquezzy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Most of the major carriers can. It's the new usps tariffs that's still not setup with third party vendors for tariff collection.

[–] mitch@piefed.mitch.science 1 points 4 days ago

Collecting? Yes.

Paying back out to the government? Not at all.