this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2025
27 points (96.6% liked)

Canada

10399 readers
495 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Kind of a sensationalist headline, but the tl;dr is that Canada lacks a federal retraction and other misconduct in biomedical research body - unlike the US, which has one (for now).

By contrast, the U.S. Office of Research Integrity, a federal body which oversees misconduct in federally funded biomedical research, publicly lists all confirmed cases.

In 2010, the Council of Canadian Academies — an independent body that supports science-based policy — recommended the government create a Canadian Council for Research Integrity, a national office similar to the U.S. Office of Research Integrity. Canada never moved ahead with the proposal, and has no current plans to do so.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

I have been advocating for a Canadian office of research integrity for 25 years and multiple federal governments, met with many MPs. Short story: no one gives a shit, because no one in Ottawa takes research seriously and never has.

Canada is a haven of fraudsters in science. Not hard to spot. When a lab publishes a manuscript every 11 days for 30 years and gets every award and millions on funding, there is a fundamental problem.

CDN researchers get away with things that would lose their jobs, funding, and remove institutional funding in the US (see Duke having to return $200M).

The agencies punt integrity to institutions, who have a clear conflict of interest. This results in >300 active investigations, 85 alone at UHN, that have an average resolution time of 15 years, I.e. kick the ball forward until the researcher retires.

[–] Binzy_Boi@piefed.ca 4 points 6 days ago

...only now?