this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
743 points (99.1% liked)

Comic Strips

19059 readers
1580 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 88 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's about authoritarianism! You're busy wondering if he's wearing pants, but the point is he is not doing whatever he wants. His dad programmed him to do what he's told.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

His dad programmed him to do what he's told.

Well THAT sentence caught my attention. My wife and I are very much in an "It Ends With Us" mindset when it comes to that kind of indoctrination. Which, by the way, often comes from otherwise loving and well-meaning parents who are indoctrinated themselves.

My son seems to have a lot of the same tendencies as me, and a life full of anxiety over all the rules around you is not what I have planned, to say the least. It's quite possible to be the awesome fun parents and also raise a person who isn't an asshole, as long as you remember to prioritize those things and put in some effort. (the word "effort" sounds negative there, but the secret is that spending that time on your kid will almost always be the best choice for your own future well being. Close family relationships are a big deal to our brains, turns out)

What fucks with me is that you can't control all the variables. School and peers can outweigh the ideas you try to put forward. I feel like I'm working on deprogramming more than I actually have a chance to teach already and my kids are only small.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean... I can't tell if he has pants on or not in that final panel. Maybe he won? 🤷‍♂️

[–] Tja@programming.dev 9 points 5 days ago

One of the many perks of remote work!

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago

Schroedinger's pants. He may be wearing them or not, depending on your interpretation.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 44 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

Neither do I

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago (1 children)

On the bright side with remote work you can work without pants.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Look closer, he isn't working from home. That's a cubicle

[–] udon@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

maybe he lives there

[–] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 6 days ago (3 children)

joke's on you, i work from home and a t-shirt is all i need ^^

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't even need a shirt. Webcam not required.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I almost forgot to put on a proper shirt one time (I was wearing a tank top) and realized as soon as I turned on my camera. Fortunately I was able to duck quickly and turn it off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] razorcandy@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

It’s like the mullet of remote work: business on top (suit), party on the bottom (underwear or sweatpants if it’s cold).

Edit: I overlooked that he’s in a cubicle but my point still stands (sits?).

[–] espentan@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Yeah, I liked this one. The first layer is "haha, he's not wearing pants, rad lad", then the next layer hits; "oh shit, he is wearing pants, and he's definitely not doing what he wants..".

[–] bsit@sopuli.xyz 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (14 children)

Here's a conundrum: what if most people wanted to organize the society in a certain way? They are doing what they want. Are they not allowed to do that? People who make complaints about not being able to do what they want rarely seem keen to grant others the same privilege.

Also, the guy in the comic is doing exactly what he wants - it's just that he probably wanted a job more than he wanted to not wear pants. The issue isn't not being able to do what one wants, the issue is that people don't want any inconvenience for doing so. The more you learn to tolerate inconvenience, the more free you are to do whatever you want. But you can't have your cake and eat it too.

You can't both resist a system and then demand to be able to enjoy the fruits of the system you are resisting.

[–] Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net 5 points 6 days ago (29 children)

He only "wants" a job because of the oppressive systemic forces that dictate the society he lives in necessitating him having one or else his access to material necessities be threatened.

The guy is not doing what he wants. He is being forced into doing what he is told to do (work a meaningless office job) because he was conditioned in childhood to do just that by his parents instead of doing what he wants.

load more comments (29 replies)

How do you know he's wearing pants in the last panel?

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You can't both resist a system and then demand to be able to enjoy the fruits of the system you are resisting.

I've spoken with some folks who might arrrrrgue with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

When WFH you better bet I've done this.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Nobody is forcing you to work a white collar 9-5. The dad was 100 percent right.

[–] Guitarfun@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

That's not entirely true. I've worked many intense labor positions. I excelled in them and loved getting paid to exercise. The pay was shit and the hours were completely unreliable. I tried really hard to get another similar job with a more successful company and got basically nowhere. I now make way more than I ever have now that I work in the public sector in a DBA/development position.

I love the work and have always loved working with code, but honestly I'd prefer doing manual labor. I was in great shape, I could study audiobooks all day, and I could be high all day. Manual labor work is fucking great! The problem was I had no paid holidays, no sick time, no benefits whatsoever, the hours weren't guaranteed, and my coworkers and boss were extremely racist and often dropped the N word out of nowhere. I'm part Mexican and often reminded them of that fact, but I know they just saw me as ""One of the good ones". Also they made the position a 1099 position even though I worked for one company and had 0 control over anything.

I'd still switch back to manual labor if I could make the same amount I do now with the same benefits.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 5 points 5 days ago

I agree to a point. I love the work i do. It makes money and helps keep the family afloat, but since it is a leading role in early education with challenging kids it gives me the opportunity to do something that can help a lot of children that would otherwise be grinded down by the system.

But.

I still miss spending time with my kids. I still hate that i can't support my wife the same way i could during our stay at home year together.

If i would be financially independent i would for sure do something beneficial to others with my time, but it would't take up quite as much of my time and energy.

So yes, nobody has to work a white collar job. If you are privileged enough to have a choice, by all means do something that you love. But it still is something most of us have to do.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

And yet, this young dude will most likely also procreate. What a great concept for existing. Working for someone else's good life most of your own life. Dressing, behaving, speaking, thinking in conformity and uniformity with only a slight tolerance for deviation. And then also procreating and spreading the disease to their children. True love 😁

[–] itkovian@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Are you thinking what I am thinking?

[–] mstrk@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Yes. I don't put on pants for work.

load more comments
view more: next ›